* [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet @ 2020-06-28 11:52 Wolfram Sang 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: " Wolfram Sang 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: " Wolfram Sang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Wolfram Sang @ 2020-06-28 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-i2c Cc: linux-renesas-soc, Wolfram Sang, David Daney, Jan Glauber, linux-kernel, Michael Shych, Wolfram Sang I am preparing to add RECV_LEN support to Renesas I2C drivers. On my way, I found these two peculiarities. Let's discuss them. Wolfram Sang (2): i2c: mlxcpld: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet i2c: octeon: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c | 4 ++-- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet 2020-06-28 11:52 [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet Wolfram Sang @ 2020-06-28 11:52 ` Wolfram Sang 2020-06-28 13:50 ` Michael Shych 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: " Wolfram Sang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Wolfram Sang @ 2020-06-28 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-i2c Cc: linux-renesas-soc, Wolfram Sang, Vadim Pasternak, Michael Shych, Wolfram Sang, linux-kernel I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in the SMBus 2.0 specs. I don't see a reason to add 1 here. Also, fix the errno to what is suggested for this error. Fixes: c9bfdc7c16cb ("i2c: mlxcpld: Add support for smbus block read transaction") Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- Only build tested, I don't have the HW. Please let me know if I overlooked something, but to the best of my knowledge, this +1 is wrong. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c index 2fd717d8dd30..71d7bae2cbca 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c @@ -337,9 +337,9 @@ static int mlxcpld_i2c_wait_for_tc(struct mlxcpld_i2c_priv *priv) if (priv->smbus_block && (val & MLXCPLD_I2C_SMBUS_BLK_BIT)) { mlxcpld_i2c_read_comm(priv, MLXCPLD_LPCI2C_NUM_DAT_REG, &datalen, 1); - if (unlikely(datalen > (I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 1))) { + if (unlikely(datalen > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)) { dev_err(priv->dev, "Incorrect smbus block read message len\n"); - return -E2BIG; + return -EPROTO; } } else { datalen = priv->xfer.data_len; -- 2.20.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: " Wolfram Sang @ 2020-06-28 13:50 ` Michael Shych 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael Shych @ 2020-06-28 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Pasternak, Wolfram Sang, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, You are right, +1 isn't required. Checked your patch also on HW. It works OK. Thank you, Michael. > -----Original Message----- > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 2:53 PM > To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang- > engineering.com>; Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>; Michael Shych > <michaelsh@mellanox.com>; Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN > packet > > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in > the > SMBus 2.0 specs. I don't see a reason to add 1 here. Also, fix the errno > to what is suggested for this error. > > Fixes: c9bfdc7c16cb ("i2c: mlxcpld: Add support for smbus block read > transaction") > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > --- > > Only build tested, I don't have the HW. Please let me know if I > overlooked something, but to the best of my knowledge, this +1 is wrong. > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c > index 2fd717d8dd30..71d7bae2cbca 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c > @@ -337,9 +337,9 @@ static int mlxcpld_i2c_wait_for_tc(struct mlxcpld_i2c_priv > *priv) > if (priv->smbus_block && (val & > MLXCPLD_I2C_SMBUS_BLK_BIT)) { > mlxcpld_i2c_read_comm(priv, > MLXCPLD_LPCI2C_NUM_DAT_REG, > &datalen, 1); > - if (unlikely(datalen > (I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 1))) { > + if (unlikely(datalen > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)) { > dev_err(priv->dev, "Incorrect smbus block read > message len\n"); > - return -E2BIG; > + return -EPROTO; > } > } else { > datalen = priv->xfer.data_len; > -- > 2.20.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet 2020-06-28 11:52 [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet Wolfram Sang 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: " Wolfram Sang @ 2020-06-28 11:52 ` Wolfram Sang 2020-07-24 19:45 ` Wolfram Sang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Wolfram Sang @ 2020-06-28 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-i2c Cc: linux-renesas-soc, Wolfram Sang, Robert Richter, Wolfram Sang, David Daney, Jan Glauber, linux-kernel I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in the SMBus 2.0 specs. I don't see a reason to add 1 here. Fixes: 886f6f8337dd ("i2c: octeon: Support I2C_M_RECV_LEN") Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- Only build tested, I don't have the HW. Please let me know if I overlooked something, but to the best of my knowledge, this +1 is wrong. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c index d9607905dc2f..845eda70b8ca 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int octeon_i2c_read(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, int target, if (result) return result; if (recv_len && i == 0) { - if (data[i] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 1) + if (data[i] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) return -EPROTO; length += data[i]; } -- 2.20.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: " Wolfram Sang @ 2020-07-24 19:45 ` Wolfram Sang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Wolfram Sang @ 2020-07-24 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-i2c, Robert Richter Cc: linux-renesas-soc, David Daney, Jan Glauber, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1170 bytes --] On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 01:52:45PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX defines already the maximum number as defined in the > SMBus 2.0 specs. I don't see a reason to add 1 here. > > Fixes: 886f6f8337dd ("i2c: octeon: Support I2C_M_RECV_LEN") > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > --- Robert, is this correct? > > Only build tested, I don't have the HW. Please let me know if I > overlooked something, but to the best of my knowledge, this +1 is wrong. > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c > index d9607905dc2f..845eda70b8ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int octeon_i2c_read(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, int target, > if (result) > return result; > if (recv_len && i == 0) { > - if (data[i] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX + 1) > + if (data[i] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) > return -EPROTO; > length += data[i]; > } > -- > 2.20.1 > [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-24 19:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-06-28 11:52 [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: check correct size of maximum RECV_LEN packet Wolfram Sang 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] i2c: mlxcpld: " Wolfram Sang 2020-06-28 13:50 ` Michael Shych 2020-06-28 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: " Wolfram Sang 2020-07-24 19:45 ` Wolfram Sang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox