From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] i2c: i801: Improve disabling runtime pm
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 13:26:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831132609.201c37f2@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41456674-800b-a4c2-3b2c-d5af18c58e61@gmail.com>
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:05:41 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 26.08.2021 16:00, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > If pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay() is not suitable for the task then
> > maybe we need a better API. I will admit I'm at a loss when it comes to
> > the many pm_runtime_* calls, I'm not going to claim I fully understand
> > what each of them is doing exactly. But don't we want to simply call
> > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() here?
> >
> > If not and there's no suitable API for the task at the moment, then
> > better do not apply this patch, and instead ask the PM subsystem
> > maintainers if they would be willing to implement what we need.
>
> To follow-up on this: This patch has been applied already. Therefore,
> if decision is to not go with it, it would need to be reverted.
Technically it's not in Linus' tree yet ;-)
I'm still interested to know if pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() is
the right call to use in this situation.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-06 21:10 [PATCH v2 0/9] i2c: i801: Series with improvements Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-06 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] i2c: i801: Improve disabling runtime pm Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-10 20:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-11 15:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-11 20:03 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-12 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-17 20:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-26 14:00 ` Jean Delvare
2021-08-26 14:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-31 6:05 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-31 11:26 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2021-08-31 20:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-09-01 6:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-06 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] i2c: i801: make p2sb_spinlock a mutex Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-10 20:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-11 15:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-11 20:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-12 9:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-06 21:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] i2c: i801: Remove not needed debug message Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-10 20:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] i2c: i801: Improve is_dell_system_with_lis3lv02d Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-11 15:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-11 20:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-12 9:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-26 14:19 ` Jean Delvare
2021-08-26 13:21 ` Jean Delvare
2021-09-29 19:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] i2c: i801: Remove not needed check for PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-11 15:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-26 15:18 ` Jean Delvare
2021-09-29 19:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-06 21:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] i2c: i801: Improve i801_acpi_probe/remove functions Heiner Kallweit
2021-09-29 19:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-06 21:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] i2c: i801: Improve i801_add_mux Heiner Kallweit
2021-09-29 19:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-08-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] i2c: i801: Improve register_dell_lis3lv02d_i2c_device Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-11 15:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-11 21:05 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-12 9:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-27 16:21 ` Jean Delvare
2021-09-29 20:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-10-01 11:46 ` Jean Delvare
2021-08-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] i2c: i801: Improve handling platform data for tco device Heiner Kallweit
2021-08-11 15:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-10-02 7:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-29 8:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-29 19:54 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-29 19:53 ` [PATCH v3] " Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210831132609.201c37f2@endymion \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox