From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: i801: Replace acpi_lock with I2C bus lock
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:01:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230828090110.0cf57a00@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e31596a9-2753-8528-9fed-5fb17de1d138@gmail.com>
Hi Heiner,
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 18:21:43 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 26.06.2023 19:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Looks reasonable, I also can't see any reason why that wouldn't work.
> > But locking and power management can be tricky of course. I'll test
> > this for some time, but I don't think my system actually suffers from
> > this ACPI resource conflict, so this most probably won't be testing
> > much in practice.
>
> What's your opinion after more testing?
Positive, as I did not hit any problem. As said before, my testing is
limited by design and thus is no guarantee that the change is OK in all
cases, but at least it's good enough to merge it and see what happens.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-28 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-04 21:30 [PATCH 0/4] i2c: i801: next set of improvements Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-04 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] i2c: i801: Use i2c_mark_adapter_suspended/resumed Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-14 22:24 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-15 21:17 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-15 21:45 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-16 6:00 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-26 17:20 ` Jean Delvare
2023-08-27 16:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-04 21:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] i2c: i801: Replace acpi_lock with I2C bus lock Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-14 22:31 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-15 21:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-15 21:49 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-26 17:59 ` Jean Delvare
2023-08-27 16:21 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-08-28 7:01 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2023-09-15 14:01 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-04 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] i2c: i801: Improve i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-14 22:32 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-15 21:48 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-27 13:46 ` Jean Delvare
2023-08-27 17:14 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-08-28 13:27 ` Jean Delvare
2023-08-28 15:10 ` Jean Delvare
2023-08-29 6:08 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-08-29 6:29 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-03-04 21:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] i2c: i801: Switch to new macro DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS Heiner Kallweit
2023-06-14 22:37 ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-28 7:15 ` Jean Delvare
2023-09-22 9:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-22 10:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-05-16 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] i2c: i801: next set of improvements Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230828090110.0cf57a00@endymion.delvare \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox