Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Revert recent changes to i2c_dw_probe_lock_support()

[Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On 1/14/24 19:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 08:26:28PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>> Hold on, I'm testing this on top of next-20240111 and still seeing the
>>>> splat...
>>>>
>>> Btw, does this reproduce always? Can we be mislead if it happens somewhat
>>> randomly? Happens to boot once we revert some commits and then at another
>>> Andy's nearby commit does not and we make the wrong conclusion?
>>
>> Thanks for all the work trying to find the regression so far. As I want
>> to send out my pull request soon, I think it is safest if I revert the
>> whole series and we start with a clean new version.
> 
> Oh, but true. Let's start over later on. I will rearrange patches and Cc to AMD
> in the next version, so we will have unquestionable ones first.
> 
I think everybody also likes sentence below from 
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:

"If you cannot condense your patch set into a smaller set of patches,
then only post say 15 or so at a time and wait for review and integration."