From: Sanford Rockowitz <rockowitz@minsoft.com>
To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: i2c-dev mismatch with proprietary nvidia driver
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 21:12:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6330FC96.5030908@minsoft.com> (raw)
I'm not sure where to post this bug report on the Linux side, I have
already posted it at developer.nvida.com. If there's a more appropriate
location, please let me know.
At approximately line 41 of nvidia driver file nv-i2c.c, in function
nv_i2c_algo_master_transfer(), there's an if-test for symbol
I2C_M_DMA_SAFE. If the symbol is not defined, a call to the function
with the bit set fails with error -EINVAL. The file includes
"linux/i2c.h", so apparently there are versions of I2c.h in which the
flag is undefined.
At approximately line 262 of i2c-dev driver file i2c-dev.c, in function
i2cdev_ioctl_wdrw(), this bit is set unconditionally, with the comment
"memdup_user allocates with GFP_KERNEL, so DMA is ok ". This behavior is
not the result of the userspace caller setting the flag, the driver sets
it unconditionally. The result is that calls into i2c-dev using its
ioctl() interface, as opposed to the read()/write() interface, always
fail with error EINVAL.
Every version of i2c.h that I have defines I2C_M_DMA_SAFE, so the
version of the nvidia driver that DKMS builds for me works. However, as
the developer of ddcutil (https://github.com/rockowitz/ddcutil,
https://www.ddcutil.com) I receive bug reports of failures with the
nvidia proprietary driver due to this mismatch, so it is a problem.
I
next reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-26 1:12 Sanford Rockowitz [this message]
2022-09-28 19:16 ` i2c-dev mismatch with proprietary nvidia driver Wolfram Sang
2022-09-29 16:21 ` Sanford Rockowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6330FC96.5030908@minsoft.com \
--to=rockowitz@minsoft.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox