[GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc3

[GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc3

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Wolfram,

I've collected one fix for rc3. It’s rebased on top of the latest
patch you merged from my fixes branch, which in turn is based on
rc2, so there's no tag for it.

I still haven't had the chance to read your naming conversion
series, last week has been quite packed. If you feel it's ready
to move forward, please go ahead. Otherwise, if you can give me
one more week, I'll make sure to review it properly.

Thanks, and wishing you a great weekend,
Andi

The following changes since commit d88d96c79919ef615e6055b77cf8e191b214ed3a:

  dt-bindings: i2c: nvidia,tegra20-i2c: Specify the required properties (2025-06-17 20:10:57 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git tags/i2c-host-fixes-6.16-rc3

for you to fetch changes up to 941af7ffcbf5503867da2319d2b6a7a188c83b1c:

  i2c: k1: check for transfer error (2025-06-17 23:58:22 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc3

k1: report the proper error in case of i2c transfer error

----------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Elder (1):
      i2c: k1: check for transfer error

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-k1.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc3

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 937 bytes --]

Hi Andi,

> I've collected one fix for rc3. It’s rebased on top of the latest
> patch you merged from my fixes branch, which in turn is based on
> rc2, so there's no tag for it.

Hmm, rebasing to rc2 was probably a not so good idea. After I pulled
your branch, I now have the Tegra patch from rc1 twice. So, I will
"drop" this pull request and apply the k1 patch myself with your tag.
I think this is the easiest solution...

> I still haven't had the chance to read your naming conversion
> series, last week has been quite packed. If you feel it's ready
> to move forward, please go ahead. Otherwise, if you can give me
> one more week, I'll make sure to review it properly.

Oh, the patch is fine. It is just a scripted search-and-replace,
verified by buildbots. I didn't want a review, just an OK that I am not
interfering with a plan of yours I might be unaware of.

Have a nice weekend, too!

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]