[GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

[GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Wolfram,

in this pull request you have included also the previous week's
patches. Everything is rebased on top of rc6.

I wish you a great weekend,
Andi

The following changes since commit 347e9f5043c89695b01e66b3ed111755afcf1911:

  Linux 6.16-rc6 (2025-07-13 14:25:58 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git tags/i2c-host-fixes-6.16-rc7

for you to fetch changes up to c39101198e733cacb03fbaa6fcefa15b9c04361c:

  i2c: qup: jump out of the loop in case of timeout (2025-07-17 00:57:13 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

- omap: add missing error check and fix PM disable in probe
  failure path
- qup: avoid potential hang when waiting for bus idle
- stm32: unmap DMA buffer on xfer failure and fix device
  reference
- tegra: improve ACPI reset error handling
- virtio: use interruptible wait to prevent hang during transfer

----------------------------------------------------------------
Akhil R (1):
      i2c: tegra: Fix reset error handling with ACPI

Christophe JAILLET (2):
      i2c: omap: Handle omap_i2c_init() errors in omap_i2c_probe()
      i2c: omap: Fix an error handling path in omap_i2c_probe()

Clément Le Goffic (2):
      i2c: stm32: fix the device used for the DMA map
      i2c: stm32f7: unmap DMA mapped buffer

Viresh Kumar (1):
      i2c: virtio: Avoid hang by using interruptible completion wait

Yang Xiwen (1):
      i2c: qup: jump out of the loop in case of timeout

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c    |  7 +++++--
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c     |  4 +++-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32.c   |  8 +++-----
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c   | 24 +-----------------------
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c  | 15 ++++++++-------
 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]

Hi Andi,

> in this pull request you have included also the previous week's
> patches. Everything is rebased on top of rc6.

Sorry, not pulled. Maybe they slipped through the cracks, but I wrote
two mails *not* to send me a rebased branch but an incrementally updated
one [1] [2]. Rebasing public trees pulled in by someone else lead to a
number of problems e.g. original mail of thread [2].

So, I just sent last weeks PR to Linus. If that is in rc7, then you can
rebase the missing patches from here to rc7. Because that one I haven't
pulled yet.

Makes sense?

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/aHSsSwLcSzJr5knE@shikoro
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/aHYK9RWJ7GqTzvY2@shikoro

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Wolfram,

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 08:19:50PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> > in this pull request you have included also the previous week's
> > patches. Everything is rebased on top of rc6.
> 
> Sorry, not pulled. Maybe they slipped through the cracks, but I wrote
> two mails *not* to send me a rebased branch but an incrementally updated
> one [1] [2]. Rebasing public trees pulled in by someone else lead to a
> number of problems e.g. original mail of thread [2].

sorry, I missed your second e-mail and I misunderstood your first
e-mail (I thought you haven't pulled anything, yet).

> So, I just sent last weeks PR to Linus. If that is in rc7, then you can
> rebase the missing patches from here to rc7. Because that one I haven't
> pulled yet.
> 
> Makes sense?

OK, I will now rebase everything missing on top of rc7.

Thanks and sorry for the confusion,
Andi

Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.16-rc7

[Wolfram Sang]

Hi Andi,

> sorry, I missed your second e-mail and I misunderstood your first
> e-mail (I thought you haven't pulled anything, yet).

Oh, okay, noted. Will try to be less ambiguous in the future!

> OK, I will now rebase everything missing on top of rc7.

Perfect, thank you!

   Wolfram