From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i2c: designware: unhandled interrupt on N100 lpss channel 0
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:27:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af839910-2c3d-4559-b8b3-1c6f2372144e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3f2debf-c762-48d9-876e-bcb60841f909@gmail.com>
On 19.03.2024 22:11, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On a N100-based mini pc I see the following. I found older reports with the same symptom,
> but root cause seems to be different.
>
> - Interrupt 27 is not shared in my case
> - I checked register values on entering the ISR. Interrupt mask and DW_IC_RAW_INTR_STAT
> are both 0.
> - After an interrupt storm of 100,000 interrupts the interrupt gets disabled
> - The issue affects channel 0 only
>
> If not the I2C IP, then who else can touch the interrupt line?
I noticed that after including INTEL_IDMA64 in my config the problem no longer occurs.
So there seems to be a dependency. Should it be reflected in Kconfig, e.g.
make MFD_INTEL_LPSS dependent on INTEL_IDMA64, or let it imply INTEL_IDMA64?
> May the BIOS play a role here? I have few ACPI errors on boot, and it seems the vendor
> of this dirt-cheap device didn't give much love to the BIOS.
>
>
> [ 5.228854] irq 27: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [ 5.228929] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-next-20240312+ #4
> [ 5.228981] Hardware name: Default string Default string/Default string, BIOS ADLN.M6.SODIMM.ZB.CY.015 08/08/2023
> [ 5.229045] Call Trace:
> [ 5.229065] <IRQ>
> [ 5.229084] dump_stack_lvl+0x81/0xe0
> [ 5.229125] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
> [ 5.229154] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0xc0
> [ 5.229190] note_interrupt+0x28f/0x2d0
> [ 5.229220] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
> [ 5.229262] handle_irq_event+0x70/0x80
> [ 5.229296] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x90/0x210
> [ 5.229331] __common_interrupt+0x6f/0x140
> [ 5.229369] common_interrupt+0xab/0xd0
> [ 5.229403] </IRQ>
> [ 5.229420] <TASK>
> [ 5.229440] asm_common_interrupt+0x27/0x40
> [ 5.229476] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xff/0x4f0
> [ 5.229516] Code: 8b 00 48 0f a3 05 c1 7f 9d 00 0f 82 fd 02 00 00 31 ff e8 a4 03 6a ff 80 7d cf 00 0f 85 cc 02 00 00 e8 15 e0 77 ff fb 45 85 ff <0f> 88 f4 01 00 00 49 63 f7 4c 89 f2 48 8d 04 76 48 8d 04 86 49 8d
> [ 5.229627] RSP: 0018:ffffa6c44016fe58 EFLAGS: 00000202
> [ 5.229668] RAX: 000000000007a19b RBX: ffffc6c43fcac660 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 5.229715] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89323d8f RDI: ffffffff8930f62b
> [ 5.229760] RBP: ffffa6c44016fe98 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 5.229806] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffa2a0b7aad824 R12: 0000000000000001
> [ 5.229851] R13: ffffffff895b69a0 R14: 0000000137a9c564 R15: 0000000000000001
> [ 5.229907] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xfb/0x4f0
> [ 5.229946] cpuidle_enter+0x29/0x40
> [ 5.229978] call_cpuidle+0x1d/0x40
> [ 5.230010] do_idle+0x1c2/0x220
> [ 5.230040] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x30
> [ 5.230072] start_secondary+0xf9/0x100
> [ 5.230105] common_startup_64+0x13e/0x148
> [ 5.230148] </TASK>
> [ 5.230166] handlers:
> [ 5.230185] [<00000000a498cda6>] i2c_dw_isr [i2c_designware_core]
> [ 5.230354] Disabling IRQ #27
>
>
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
> 8: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 8-edge rtc0
> 9: 0 51 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 9-fasteoi acpi
> 16: 0 3 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 16-fasteoi i801_smbus
> 27: 0 100000 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 27-fasteoi i2c_designware.0
> 29: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 29-fasteoi i2c_designware.2
> 31: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 31-fasteoi i2c_designware.4
> 32: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 32-fasteoi i2c_designware.5
> 33: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 33-fasteoi i2c_designware.3
> 40: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 40-fasteoi i2c_designware.1
>
> Thanks, Heiner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 21:11 i2c: designware: unhandled interrupt on N100 lpss channel 0 Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-20 12:27 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2024-03-20 13:37 ` Jarkko Nikula
2024-03-20 14:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-20 14:56 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-20 15:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-20 20:21 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-20 21:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-20 21:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-20 21:26 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-20 21:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-21 11:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-21 11:59 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-21 17:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-21 21:00 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-03-22 16:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-22 19:28 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-04-02 20:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-05 16:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-05 19:21 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af839910-2c3d-4559-b8b3-1c6f2372144e@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox