From: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Sanket.Goswami@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] i2c: piix4: Adjust the SMBus debug message
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 16:31:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f45a7b40-8395-4aec-91bc-37c07eb6c8e2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7jdrjtyln26ikkm6wjz4jc2hcynqniejepjjlm66ukxeayfkbo@u4tgx3bmqtqq>
Hi Andi,
On 9/4/2024 03:21, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Shyam,
>
>> @@ -1194,6 +1194,7 @@ static int piix4_add_adapter(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned short smba,
>> {
>> struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>> struct i2c_piix4_adapdata *adapdata;
>> + char *node = "PIIX4";
>
> please, make this const and initialize it...
>
>> int retval;
>>
>> adap = kzalloc(sizeof(*adap), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1213,6 +1214,7 @@ static int piix4_add_adapter(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned short smba,
>> adap->algo = &piix4_smbus_algorithm_sb800;
>> break;
>
> ... here.
>
>> case SMBUS_ASF:
>> + node = "ASF";
>> adap->algo = &sb800_asf_smbus_algorithm;
>> break;
>
> shall we have a default case here? I thought checkpatch complains
> when no default is specified.
checkpatch does not complain about it. I have added a default case
based on your suggestion in v2. Kindly have a look.
Thanks,
Shyam
>
> Thanks,
> Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 14:21 [PATCH 0/5] Add ASF Controller Support to the i2c-piix4 driver Shyam Sundar S K
2024-08-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: piix4: Allow more than two algo selection for SMBus Shyam Sundar S K
2024-09-03 21:49 ` Andi Shyti
2024-08-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: piix4: Add i2c_algorithm operations to support AMD ASF with SMBus Shyam Sundar S K
2024-08-26 10:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-26 11:04 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: piix4: Add ACPI support for ASF SMBus device Shyam Sundar S K
2024-08-26 10:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-03 19:36 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2024-09-03 20:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 11:03 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2024-08-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: piix4: Adjust the SMBus debug message Shyam Sundar S K
2024-09-03 21:51 ` Andi Shyti
2024-09-04 11:01 ` Shyam Sundar S K [this message]
2024-08-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: piix4: Clear remote IRR bit to get successive interrupt Shyam Sundar S K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f45a7b40-8395-4aec-91bc-37c07eb6c8e2@amd.com \
--to=shyam-sundar.s-k@amd.com \
--cc=Sanket.Goswami@amd.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox