From: bbrezillon@kernel.org (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() accept PID, BCR, DCR
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:25:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211132446.4d93fd10@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211132103.34ae80c8@bbrezillon>
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:21:03 +0100
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:07:16 +0000
> vitor <vitor.soares@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11/12/18 11:58, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > >> I just want to skip GETBCR/DCR/PID operations since those data are
> > >> already available in the controller. There's advantages but they
> > >> only have relevance depending of use case.
> > > Can you detail those use cases please?
> >
> > If the bus has a lot of devices and you want to decrease the
> > initialization time this could be the first step.
> >
>
> Did you quantify the boot-time/perf improvement? The clk should be
> running at 12.5MHz, GETPID takes 9bytes and GETBCR/DCR take 4 bytes
> each. Let's add one byte per command to account for the start/stop
> bits. That makes a total of 20bytes per device, with a maximum of 11
> devices per bus:
>
> max_time_to_query_pid_bcr_dcr_per_bus = 20 * 10 / 12500000 = 17.6 usec.
Sorry, small mistake, I counted bytes instead of bits.
max_time_to_query_pid_bcr_dcr_per_bus = 20 * 8 * 11 / 12500000 = 141usec.
> Let's assume we have a huge overhead caused by the OS (and all the
> scheduling involved), and make it 100usec.
And let's make it 500usec with the OS overhead, which is still not
particularly worrisome in term of boot-time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-11 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 19:21 i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() accept PID, BCR, DCR vitor
2018-12-10 19:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 20:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-11 11:54 ` vitor
2018-12-11 11:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-11 12:07 ` vitor
2018-12-11 12:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-11 12:25 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-12-11 15:47 ` vitor
2018-12-12 6:06 ` Przemyslaw Gaj
2018-12-12 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 8:37 ` Przemyslaw Gaj
2018-12-12 8:52 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 9:02 ` Przemyslaw Gaj
2018-12-12 9:09 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181211132446.4d93fd10@bbrezillon \
--to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox