public inbox for linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bbrezillon@kernel.org (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() accept PID, BCR, DCR
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:25:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181211132446.4d93fd10@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211132103.34ae80c8@bbrezillon>

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:21:03 +0100
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:07:16 +0000
> vitor <vitor.soares@synopsys.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/12/18 11:58, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> > >> I just want to skip GETBCR/DCR/PID operations since those data are
> > >> already available in the controller. There's advantages but they
> > >> only have relevance depending of use case.    
> > > Can you detail those use cases please?    
> > 
> > If the bus has a lot of devices and you want to decrease the
> > initialization time this could be the first step.
> >   
> 
> Did you quantify the boot-time/perf improvement? The clk should be
> running at 12.5MHz, GETPID takes 9bytes and GETBCR/DCR take 4 bytes
> each. Let's add one byte per command to account for the start/stop
> bits. That makes a total of 20bytes per device, with a maximum of 11
> devices per bus:
> 
> max_time_to_query_pid_bcr_dcr_per_bus = 20 * 10 / 12500000 = 17.6 usec.

Sorry, small mistake, I counted bytes instead of bits.

max_time_to_query_pid_bcr_dcr_per_bus = 20 * 8 * 11 / 12500000 = 141usec.

> Let's assume we have a huge overhead caused by the OS (and all the
> scheduling involved), and make it 100usec.

And let's make it 500usec with the OS overhead, which is still not
particularly worrisome in term of boot-time.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-11 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-10 19:21 i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked() accept PID, BCR, DCR vitor
2018-12-10 19:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-10 20:14   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-11 11:54     ` vitor
2018-12-11 11:58       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-11 12:07         ` vitor
2018-12-11 12:21           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-11 12:25             ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-12-11 15:47               ` vitor
2018-12-12  6:06                 ` Przemyslaw Gaj
2018-12-12  8:21                   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12  8:37                     ` Przemyslaw Gaj
2018-12-12  8:52                       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12  9:02                         ` Przemyslaw Gaj
2018-12-12  9:09                           ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181211132446.4d93fd10@bbrezillon \
    --to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox