Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] i3c: master: Add Qualcomm I3C master controller driver

[Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com>]

Thanks Krzysztof !

On 2/9/2025 5:10 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/02/2025 13:03, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
>>>> +	gi3c->se.clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "se-clk");
>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(gi3c->se.clk)) {
>>>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(gi3c->se.clk);
>>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error getting SE Core clk %d\n", ret);
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "se-clock-frequency", &gi3c->clk_src_freq);
>>>
>>> You never tested your DTS or this code... Drop
>>>
>> I have tested on SM8550 MTP only. Below entry in my internal/local DTSI.
> 
> 
> And how is it supposed to work? Are you going to send us your local
> internal DTSI? Is it going to pass any checks?
was saying about code was testing with MTP. DTS was tested using 
dt-bindings check.
I should add "se-clock-frequency" and "dfs-index"
> 
>> Do you mean to say i should add this property in yaml too ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> You cannot add undocumented ABI. That's a strong NAK.
> 
sure , adding both properties into yaml.
> 
>> se-clock-frequency = <100000000>;
>>>
>>>> +	if (ret) {
>>>> +		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "SE clk freq not specified, default to 100 MHz.\n");
>>>> +		gi3c->clk_src_freq = 100000000;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = geni_icc_get(&gi3c->se, NULL);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Set the bus quota to a reasonable value for register access */
>>>> +	gi3c->se.icc_paths[GENI_TO_CORE].avg_bw = GENI_DEFAULT_BW;
>>>> +	gi3c->se.icc_paths[CPU_TO_GENI].avg_bw = GENI_DEFAULT_BW;
>>>> +	ret = geni_icc_set_bw(&gi3c->se);
>>>> +	if (ret) {
>>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: icc set bw failed ret:%d\n", __func__, ret);
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s: GENI_TO_CORE:%d CPU_TO_GENI:%d\n", __func__,
>>>> +		gi3c->se.icc_paths[GENI_TO_CORE].avg_bw, gi3c->se.icc_paths[CPU_TO_GENI].avg_bw);
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "dfs-index", &gi3c->dfs_idx);
>>>
>>> The same. You cannot send us hidden ABI.
>>>
>>> This code does not look like ready for upstream. Are you sure it was
>>> internally reviewed?
>>>
>> yes, we have taken 2 rounds internally.
> 
> 
> And none of the reviewers spotted undocumented ABI? OK, learning
> experience for me.
> 
> 
>> Are you saying i should add this into yaml ?  what do you mean by
>> hiddern ABI ?
> 
> 
> Where is the documentation of the ABI?
> 
can you please point to other ABI document so i can prepare and share it.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


-- 
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c