From: "JWM" <jwm@systemfabricworks.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Spinlock bug??
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:55:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003e01c73fd8$6a46f730$7401a8c0@Maelstrom> (raw)
Hi all;
I'm working on a Bull - 8 way ia64 system running a RedHat variant of
2.6.17.
I keep getting a spin lock bug and dump , attached.
It appears that cpuset_set_cpus_affinity is taking doing a task_lock on
the task structure and only releaseing it after the cpu has changed. That
naturally causes the spin_bug function to get upset.
The lock doesn't appear to be required since set_cpus_allowed makes sure
that things are serialized pretty well.
Am I missing something here or is this lock not required.
....JW
___________________________________________DUMP_______________________________________________
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#0,
process1/13439
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: lock: e000000454a00e08, .magic: dead4ead,
.owner: process1/13439, .owner_cpu: 4
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: Call Trace:
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a000000100010da0>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07c50 bspà00000454a01190
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a000000100010df0>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a01178
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : a0000001002b4980 r33 :
000000000000028b r34 : 00000000dead4ead
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a0000001002b4980>] spin_bug+0x100/0x120
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a01150
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : e000000454a00e08 r33 :
e000000454a00000 r34 : a0000001002b4d10
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r35 : 0000000000000308 r36 :
0000000000200200
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a0000001002b4d10>]
_raw_spin_unlock+0xd0/0x120
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a01120
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : e000000454a00e08 r33 :
e000000454a00e10 r34 : e000000454a00e18
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r35 : a00000010053c560 r36 :
0000000000000205 r37 : a0000001000c42c0
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a00000010053c560>]
_spin_unlock+0x20/0x40
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a01100
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : e000000454a00e08 r33 :
a0000001000c42d0 r34 : 0000000000000308
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r35 : e000000100004b18
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a0000001000c42d0>]
cpuset_set_cpus_affinity+0x110/0x160
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a010d0
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : 0000000000000000 r33 :
0000000000000001 r34 : e000000454a00e08
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r35 : a0000001000655f0 r36 :
0000000000000389 r37 : a00000010053c5e0
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a0000001000655f0>]
sched_setaffinity+0x110/0x1e0
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a01098
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : e000000454a00000 r33 :
0000000000000001 r34 : e000000454a00010
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r35 : ffffffffffffffff r36 :
a0000001000657a0 r37 : 000000000000060f
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r38 : 0000000000000000
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a0000001000657a0>]
sys_sched_setaffinity+0xe0/0x100
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e20 bspà00000454a01038
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r32 : 0000000000000000 r33 :
0000000000000080 r34 : 6000000fffcffe40
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r35 : 0000000000000000 r36 :
2000000000267ab0 r37 : 20000000004168b0
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r38 : 2000000000019280 r39 :
c000000000000711 r40 : 0000000000000000
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: r41 : a00000010000b640 r42 :
0000000000000008 r43 : 0000000000000000
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a00000010000b640>]
ia64_ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x20
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a07e30 bspà00000454a01038
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel: [<a000000000010640>]
__kernel_syscall_via_break+0x0/0x20
Jan 22 20:40:14 Itanium-2 kernel:
spà00000454a08000 bspà00000454a01038
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-24 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-24 16:55 JWM [this message]
2007-01-25 9:12 ` Spinlock bug?? Simon Derr
2007-01-25 17:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-25 21:49 ` JWM
2007-01-25 21:51 ` JWM
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003e01c73fd8$6a46f730$7401a8c0@Maelstrom' \
--to=jwm@systemfabricworks.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox