public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Jan Dittmer <jdi@l4x.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:09:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186067359.18821.553.camel@queen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070728013950.GE15129@stusta.de>

On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 03:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:21:47PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > So it seems on ia64 with gcc 3.3.6 there's some 8 byte alignment of the 
> > > array members?
> > >
> > > Sam and the ia64 maintainers Cc'ed - they might know better what's going 
> > > on here.
> > 
> > This ia64 maintainer is baffled ... but I don't see the problem here (perhaps
> > because my build machine has gcc 3.4.6).
> 
> 
> I found what causes this problem, and it only occurs during cross 
> compilation.
> 
> 
> The struct is:
> 
> #define ACPI_ID_LEN     9
> 
> struct acpi_device_id {
> 	 __u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
> 	kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> };
> 
> 
> When compiling for ia64, this results in:
> 
> struct acpi_device_id {
> 	__u8 id[9];
> 	uint64_t driver_data;
> };
> 
> 
> sizeof(struct acpi_device_id) for ia64 is due to different padding
> after id[] 20 bytes on i386 but 24 bytes on ia64.
> 
> scripts/mod/file2alias.c is compiled with HOSTCC and ensures that 
> kernel_ulong_t is correct (in this case uint64_t for ia64), but it can't 
> cope with different padding on different architectures.

This one should workaround it. Is this acceptable for now?
Don't know how to fix this in a cleaner way (but I am sure it's
possible... ). Maybe an IA64 guy who is more used to such things has a
better idea and could have a look at this if there is time...

   Thomas

-------------

Cross-compilation between e.g. i386 -> 64bit could break -> work around it

Adrian Bunk: scripts/mod/file2alias.c is compiled with HOSTCC and ensures that
kernel_ulong_t is correct, but it can't cope with different padding on
different architectures.

---
 include/linux/mod_devicetable.h |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Index: torvalds/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
=================================--- torvalds.orig/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
+++ torvalds/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
@@ -160,9 +160,11 @@ struct ap_device_id {
 #define AP_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE_TYPE		0x01
 
 #define ACPI_ID_LEN	9
+#define FILLUP_LEN	7 /* dirty fix for i386 -> 64bit cross-compilation */
 
 struct acpi_device_id {
 	__u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
+	__u8 dummy[FILLUP_LEN];
 	kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
 };
 



  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-02 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200707251238.50218.lenb@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <46A98FF9.8060801@l4x.org>
     [not found]   ` <1185553512.3849.46.camel@noname>
2007-07-27 23:07     ` [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1 Adrian Bunk
2007-07-27 23:41       ` Andreas Schwab
     [not found]       ` <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0209BB9D@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-07-28  1:39         ` scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem Adrian Bunk
2007-08-02 15:09           ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2007-08-02 16:25             ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-02 16:36               ` Andreas Schwab
2007-08-02 17:40                 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-02 18:09                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-08-02 19:15                     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-02 19:24                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-08-02 19:39                         ` Al Viro
2007-08-02 22:08               ` Rusty Russell
2007-08-02 23:03                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-16 14:27                 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-16 16:26                   ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-16 17:03                     ` Thomas Renninger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1186067359.18821.553.camel@queen.suse.de \
    --to=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=jdi@l4x.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox