From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove redundant irq_affinity definition
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:36:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16949.59351.15900.222890@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503141128.01855.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:28:01 -0800, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> said:
Jesse> What about for the mmu_context_t functions?
I looked briefly into this one and concluded that we shouldn't put the
"volatile" inside the mmu_context_t declaration. Having said that,
we'll need to be very careful about this change to make sure we
compensate with the necessary barriers were we access context-ids
outside of spinlock-protected critical sections.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-14 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-14 19:28 [PATCH] remove redundant irq_affinity definition Jesse Barnes
2005-03-14 19:36 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2005-03-14 19:51 ` Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16949.59351.15900.222890@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox