From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes)
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6] - Patch 028
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:11:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040112191154.GD11990@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040109234608.18009a2a.akpm@osdl.org>
2.6.1-mm2 compiles with NR_CPUSQ2 (and for sn2 btw, thanks), but I
haven't actually booted it on a >256p machine since they're still
somewhat rare :). Do you think you'll do an official 2.6.2 release
before Linus gets back with this stuff in it?
Thanks,
Jesse
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:46:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > Rusty, responding to Andrew, on a cpumask failure seen by Jesse:
> > > Probably. Paul Jackson acked them though, so I'm a little surprised.
> >
> > Jesse or Rusty - could you send me the earlier parts of this
> > email thread? I don't see it on lkml or ia64 email list.
> >
> > I'd like to see what I missed in Rusty's patch.
> >
> > Though I am less surprised than Rusty that I missed something;
> > I was in an easy going frame of mind when I read it. I do
> > tougher reviews when I am more irritated and untrusting.
> >
>
> Is OK, looks like Rusty was missing a couple of mk_cpumask_const()
> invokations in a -mm patch. I'm currently testing this:
>
> --- 25/include/linux/cpumask.h~make-for_each_cpu-iterator-more-friendly-fix-fix Sat Jan 10 02:15:29 2004
> +++ 25-akpm/include/linux/cpumask.h Sat Jan 10 02:16:02 2004
> @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
> #define cpu_online(cpu) cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_online_map)
> #define cpu_possible(cpu) cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_possible_map)
>
> -#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
> - for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mask); \
> - cpu < NR_CPUS; \
> - cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, mask))
> +#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
> + for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mk_cpumask_const(mask)); \
> + cpu < NR_CPUS; \
> + cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, mk_cpumask_const(mask)))
>
> #define for_each_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_possible_map)
> #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_online_map)
>
> _
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-12 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-10 7:46 [PATCH] Updating our sn code in 2.6] - Patch 028 Andrew Morton
2004-01-10 20:30 ` Paul Jackson
2004-01-12 19:11 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-01-12 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040112191154.GD11990@sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox