From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
'Andy Whitcroft' <apw@shadowen.org>,
"'Martin J. Bligh'" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
'Ray Bryant' <raybry@sgi.com>, 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: anton@samba.org, sds@epoch.ncsc.mil, ak@suse.de,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [0/6] HUGETLB memory commitment
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:49:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403292049.i2TKnvF11443@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18429360.1080233672@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk>
>>>>>> Chen, Kenneth W wrote on Mon, March 29, 2004 12:46 PM
> overcomit is not checked for hugetlb mmap, is it intentional here?
Just to follow up myself, I meant overcommit accounting is not done
for mmap hugetlb page. (typical Monday morning symptom :))
- Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-29 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-25 16:54 [PATCH] [0/6] HUGETLB memory commitment Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 16:58 ` [PATCH] [1/6] " Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 16:59 ` [PATCH] [2/6] " Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 17:00 ` [PATCH] [3/6] " Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 17:01 ` [PATCH] [4/6] " Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 17:02 ` [PATCH] [5/6] " Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 17:03 ` [PATCH] [6/6] " Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 21:04 ` [PATCH] [0/6] " Andrew Morton
2004-03-25 23:27 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-25 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-25 23:59 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-26 2:01 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-26 0:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-28 18:02 ` Ray Bryant
2004-03-28 19:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-28 21:32 ` [Lse-tech] " Ray Bryant
2004-03-29 16:50 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-03-29 12:30 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-26 0:10 ` Keith Owens
2004-03-26 0:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-26 3:41 ` [Lse-tech] " Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-03-26 3:39 ` Keith Owens
2004-03-26 11:45 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-03-29 20:45 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-29 20:49 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2004-03-30 12:57 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-30 20:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-30 21:48 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-31 1:48 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-03-31 8:51 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-03-31 16:20 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-01 21:15 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-01 22:50 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-01 23:09 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-04-03 3:57 ` [PATCH] " Ray Bryant
2004-04-04 3:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-04-04 22:15 ` Ray Bryant
2004-04-05 15:26 ` [Lse-tech] " Ray Bryant
2004-04-05 17:01 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-04-05 18:22 ` Ray Bryant
2004-04-05 23:18 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-04-06 1:05 ` Ray Bryant
2004-04-06 16:14 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-06 17:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403292049.i2TKnvF11443@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=raybry@sgi.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox