public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] I/O MCA recovery
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 18:04:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405041104.49675.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405040954.09524.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>

On Tuesday, May 4, 2004 10:51 am, Grant Grundler wrote:
> hrm...ic. And the process doesn't need to "mmap" the region/file for
> IO Port space like it would for MMIO accesses. :^(

Right, that's even worse.  I'm not sure how to deal with that (sn2 doesn't 
even support port I/O in the ia64 architected sense).

> Isn't working with the vendor to NOT do this sort of crap also an option?
> At least a few vendors offer EFI drivers for video cards...
> (ie avoid the problem of x86 BIOS in the first place)

Yeah, that's the Way Of The Future (tm), but there's a lot of legacy stuff out 
there...

> Linux really needs a driver/card that can provide HW acceleration
> without first having BIOS initializing it. parisc-linux port
> (and probably a few others) could use such a driver/card too.

The parisc port should be able to use the int10 emulator too, as long as you 
can recover from any errors that might be generated...

> > Another problem is that legacy I/O space isn't listed in any of the PCI
> > resource maps (at least as far as I know), so there would be no way to
> > track that region, which is the one that I'm *really* interested in. :)
>
> Well, if code is randomly poking around without registering with
> request_region, then your proposal is as good as any.

Ok, I'll keep hacking on it then and post a patch when I have something 
presentable.

Thanks,
Jesse

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-04 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-04 16:54 [RFC] I/O MCA recovery Jesse Barnes
2004-05-04 17:14 ` Grant Grundler
2004-05-04 17:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-04 17:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 17:51 ` Grant Grundler
2004-05-04 18:04 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-05-04 18:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-04 18:20 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 22:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-04 22:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-04 22:51 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 22:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-04 23:11 ` Grant Grundler
2004-05-04 23:13 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 23:15 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 23:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-04 23:18 ` Grant Grundler
2004-05-04 23:23 ` Alex Williamson
2004-05-04 23:31 ` Grant Grundler
2004-05-04 23:31 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 23:36 ` Grant Grundler
2004-05-12 19:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-12 21:11 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-12 21:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-12 21:35 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-12 21:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-12 21:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-12 21:54 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-12 21:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-13  9:02 ` Luck, Tony
2004-05-13 15:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-13 16:07 ` Luck, Tony
2004-05-13 16:43 ` Russ Anderson
2004-05-13 16:53 ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200405041104.49675.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox