public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lib64 in fedora glibc
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 19:23:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040604192319.GF3454@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040528214105.GK9115@mustard.zk3.dec.com>

David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com) said: 
>   Andreas> I don't know what Red Hat is doing with x86 and with lib64 - and you
>   Andreas> really should ask them for clarification.
> 
> Certainly.  I only wished Red Hat would be more
> willing/interested/active in discussing such things on public mailing
> lists.

Where this came out of was requests from various partners and ISVs
who noticed that their 32-bit apps didn't run right on ia64 with
the /emul/ia32-linux prefix. This is due to some of the fundamental
issues with that arrangement:

- 64-bit processes don't see into that tree because of their personality
  (think: shell scripts)
- the results of readdir() on a directory in /emul/ia32-linux will not
  necessarily match the files you can actually access with open()

The simplest way to solve this, while maintaining compatiblity with
ia32 packages, is to get them on the same filesystem. This is where
the proposal stemmed from, originally.

We can always just live with crappy ia32 (and by extension,
x86-64) support on ia64. :)

Bill

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-04 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-28 21:41 lib64 in fedora glibc Aron Griffis
2004-05-28 22:14 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-29  3:33 ` Aron Griffis
2004-05-29  5:21 ` Grant Grundler
2004-06-01  9:48 ` Andreas Jaeger
2004-06-04  4:58 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-04  5:08 ` Andreas Jaeger
2004-06-04  6:21 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-04  8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-04 19:23 ` Bill Nottingham [this message]
2004-06-04 20:14 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-04 20:21 ` Bill Nottingham
2004-06-04 22:15 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-07 20:05 ` Saxena, Sunil
2004-06-07 20:09 ` Bill Nottingham
2004-06-07 21:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-07 21:18 ` Bill Nottingham
2004-06-07 21:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-07 22:14 ` Bill Nottingham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040604192319.GF3454@nostromo.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=notting@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox