* [Patch] Altix patch 012-huberror for 2.6.10
@ 2004-10-19 20:23 Pat Gefre
2004-10-19 20:52 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-19 23:05 ` Jesse Barnes
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pat Gefre @ 2004-10-19 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Tony,
It looks like 2.6.10 is beginning. Do you still want us to spool our
mods to the oss site or just send them as we normally would ?
This is 012-huberror on the oss site.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
#
# Fixes calling arg1 for bte_crb_error_handler()
#
#
Index: linux/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/huberror.c
=================================--- linux.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/huberror.c 2004-10-15 13:24:59.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/huberror.c 2004-10-19 14:40:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include <asm/sn/bte.h>
void hubiio_crb_error_handler(struct hubdev_info *hubdev_info);
-extern void bte_crb_error_handler(struct hubdev_info *, int, int, ioerror_t *,
+extern void bte_crb_error_handler(cnodeid_t, int, int, ioerror_t *,
int);
static irqreturn_t hub_eint_handler(int irq, void *arg, struct pt_regs *ep)
{
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
hubiio_crb_free(hubdev_info, i);
- bte_crb_error_handler(hubdev_info, bte_num,
+ bte_crb_error_handler(nasid_to_cnodeid(nasid), bte_num,
i, &ioerror, icrbd.d_bteop);
num_errors++;
continue;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [Patch] Altix patch 012-huberror for 2.6.10
2004-10-19 20:23 [Patch] Altix patch 012-huberror for 2.6.10 Pat Gefre
@ 2004-10-19 20:52 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-19 23:05 ` Jesse Barnes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luck, Tony @ 2004-10-19 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>It looks like 2.6.10 is beginning. Do you still want us to spool our
>mods to the oss site or just send them as we normally would ?
>
>
>This is 012-huberror on the oss site.
We can go back to the tried and true method of patches
(with a Changelog and Signed-off-by) in e-mail messages
to the linux-ia64 mailing list. The ftp site was a temporary
think because your 001 and 002 patches were too big to be
mailed.
I've applied up to and including the 012 patch and pushed
the whole thing up to the new tree on bkbits:
http://lia64.bkbits.net/linux-ia64-release-2.6.10
So you should pull from there and make sure it all builds
for you before I send the "please do a bk pull" message to
Linus. Please send me an ACK when you've tested it.
-Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch] Altix patch 012-huberror for 2.6.10
2004-10-19 20:23 [Patch] Altix patch 012-huberror for 2.6.10 Pat Gefre
2004-10-19 20:52 ` Luck, Tony
@ 2004-10-19 23:05 ` Jesse Barnes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Barnes @ 2004-10-19 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:52 pm, Luck, Tony wrote:
> I've applied up to and including the 012 patch and pushed
> the whole thing up to the new tree on bkbits:
>
> http://lia64.bkbits.net/linux-ia64-release-2.6.10
>
> So you should pull from there and make sure it all builds
> for you before I send the "please do a bk pull" message to
> Linus. Please send me an ACK when you've tested it.
ACK. I've tested it on a small system and it comes up ok. I'll run it
through sparse and do some more testing tomorrow (and I'm sure Pat will too),
but I'd say it's ok for Linus to pull at this point. We'll no doubt run into
a few small things, but those will have to get fixed anyway, no reason to
hold up wider testing.
Thanks,
Jesse
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-19 23:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-19 20:23 [Patch] Altix patch 012-huberror for 2.6.10 Pat Gefre
2004-10-19 20:52 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-19 23:05 ` Jesse Barnes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox