public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: removing mm->rss and mm->anon_rss from kernel?
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 16:30:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411081730.37906.efocht@hpce.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411080800020.7996@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Monday 08 November 2004 17:04, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Nope. The future of computing seems to be very high numbers of cpus.
> NASAs Columbia has 10k cpus and the new BlueGen solution from IBM is
> already at 8k.

You're talking about clusters, i.e. multiple running instances of the
operating system. I don't think anybody really wants to go far beyond
512 nowadays. Application-wise 512 cpus/node isn't really needed (but
sometimes nice to have, for marketting). Beyond problems with
scalability of the interconnect (and very uneven latency distribution)
bigger systems would accumulate a too small MTBF. When a broken CPU,
DIMM or other chip takes your entire >1k CPU-machine down, you'll
hapilly exchage it agains a cluster.

Erich


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-08 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4189EC67.40601@yahoo.com.au>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411040820250.8211@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
     [not found]   ` <418AD329.3000609@yahoo.com.au>
     [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411041733270.11583@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
     [not found]       ` <418AE0F0.5050908@yahoo.com.au>
     [not found]         ` <418AE9BB.1000602@yahoo.com.au>
     [not found]           ` <1099622957.29587.101.camel@gaston>
     [not found]             ` <418C55A7.9030100@yahoo.com.au>
2004-11-06  9:28               ` removing mm->rss and mm->anon_rss from kernel? Christoph Lameter
     [not found]                 ` <204290000.1099754257@[10.10.2.4]>
2004-11-06 16:19                   ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-06 20:05                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-07 16:11                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-07 18:25                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-08 12:43                         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-11-08 15:26                         ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-08 16:07                           ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-08 16:04                       ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-08 16:12                         ` Anton Blanchard
2004-11-08 16:14                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-08 16:25                           ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-08 16:30                         ` Erich Focht [this message]
2004-11-08 16:57                           ` Diego Calleja
2004-11-08 17:26                             ` Erich Focht
2004-11-10 11:57                         ` Magnus Damm
2004-11-06 20:51                 ` Rik van Riel
2004-11-08 15:47                 ` Russ Anderson
2004-11-08 16:08                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-10  4:52                   ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-10 17:30                     ` Robin Holt
2004-11-10 18:50                     ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-12 23:45                     ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-13  0:05                       ` Steve Neuner
2004-11-08 16:35                 ` Rik van Riel
2004-11-08 16:56                 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-08 17:01                   ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-09  2:40                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-09 12:10                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-10  0:48                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-12  0:38                 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-12 12:50                 ` Robin Holt
2004-11-12 15:02                 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200411081730.37906.efocht@hpce.nec.com \
    --to=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox