From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Pat Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.10 Altix : ioc4 serial driver support
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:24:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041217162411.GI7113@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041216231519.GA16249@infradead.org>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:15:19PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I took a very short look and what spring to mind first is that the
Rats, I'd hoped you'd have time to do a more thorough review. Here's
some more comments:
Don't define your own names for standard PCI config space -- use the
ones in linux/pci.h instead. This whole section should be deleted:
+/*
+ * PCI Configuration Space Register Address Map, use offset from IOC4 PCI
+ * configuration base such that this can be used for multiple IOC4s
+ */
+#define IOC4_PCI_SCR 0x4 /* Status/Command */
+#define IOC4_PCI_REV 0x8 /* Revision */
+#define IOC4_PCI_LAT 0xC /* Latency Timer */
+#define IOC4_PCI_BAR0 0x10 /* IOC4 base address 0 */
+#define IOC4_PCI_SIDV 0x2c /* Subsys ID and vendor */
+#define IOC4_PCI_CAP 0x34 /* Capability pointer */
+#define IOC4_PCI_LATGNTINT 0x3c /* Max_lat, min_gnt, int_pin, int_line */
Calling a pci_dev a "pci_handle" is confusing; most code uses "pdev".
+ pci_read_config_dword(pci_handle, IOC4_PCI_SCR, &tmp);
+ pci_write_config_dword(pci_handle, IOC4_PCI_SCR,
+ tmp | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER |
+ PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY |
+ PCI_COMMAND_PARITY | PCI_COMMAND_SERR);
You call pci_set_master() before this which takes care of PCI_COMMAND_MASTER.
You also call pci_enable_device() which calls pcibios_enable_device()
which ensures PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY is set if it needs to be.
So the code above should be:
pci_read_config_dword(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
pci_write_config_dword(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd | \
PCI_COMMAND_PARITY | PCI_COMMAND_SERR);
Personally, I believe we should be setting PCI_COMMAND_PARITY and
PCI_COMMAND_SERR on all devices by default in pcibios_enable_device,
if not in pci_enable_device(). But we don't, so it's fine to do it
in your driver for the moment.
You don't need the:
+ if (!ia64_platform_is("sn2"))
+ return -ENODEV;
since this code will only ever be called if someone has an ioc4 in
their system. If it's not an sn2, something's very strange ;-)
+struct pci_driver ioc4_s_driver = {
+ name :"IOC4 Serial",
+ id_table :ioc4_s_id_table,
+ probe :ioc4_attach,
+};
please use C99 initialisers instead
+ {PCI_VENDOR_ID_SGI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SGI_IOC4, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0,0,0},
you don't need the trailing zeroes
I don't see why you need valid_icount_path(). Everywhere it's called,
you seem to have been handed an ioc4_port back by the kernel core.
Are you just checking for data corruption elsewhere, or is this masking
a bug elsewhere in the driver?
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-17 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-16 22:24 [PATCH] 2.6.10 Altix : ioc4 serial driver support Pat Gefre
2004-12-16 22:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-12-16 23:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-12-17 16:24 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2004-12-17 22:14 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-12-18 14:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041217162411.GI7113@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pfg@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox