public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix 2.6 kernel ia64 directives
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:05:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050209200547.GA31021@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050202221918.GA7973@lucon.org>

On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:35:32AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:11:48 -0800, James E Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org> said:
> 
>   >> "The assembler ignores the name operands of the
>   >> directive."
> 
>   Jim> I'd call this is a bug in the manual.
> 
> Perhaps.
> 
>   Jim> Also, I'm told that current IAS gives an error in this case, which is
>   Jim> why gas was modified to do likewise.  Unfortunately, I don't have access
>   Jim> to IAS, or to the HP assembler, so I can not check that.  If this is
>   Jim> wrong, then changing it to a warning certainly makes sense.
> 
> Why should it depend on IAS as to whether GAS does or does not produce
> an error?  The fact is that GAS has _not_ in the past issued an error

FYI, I checked the current IAS, the name after endp IS ignored by IAS.

> and it's not acceptable to break existing code for no good reason.
> Making it a warning is fine, of course.  That will alert people to the
> fact that they may have an unintentional inconsistency in their code
> and will let them fix the error at their convenience.  After enough
> time has elapsed (at least a year), the severity could (and probably
> should) be raised to an error.
> 

I guess Jim is still catching his emails. I will give him a few days
to go though my ia64 gas patches which deal this very issues.


H.J.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-02-09 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-02 22:19 PATCH: Fix 2.6 kernel ia64 directives H. J. Lu
2005-02-02 22:50 ` David Mosberger
2005-02-03  8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2005-02-07 20:11 ` James E Wilson
2005-02-07 22:18 ` James E Wilson
2005-02-09 19:35 ` David Mosberger
2005-02-09 20:05 ` H. J. Lu [this message]
2005-02-09 20:10 ` James E Wilson
2005-02-09 21:11 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050209200547.GA31021@lucon.org \
    --to=hjl@lucon.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox