From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
clameter@sgi.com, jes@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:26:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060317152645.52112021.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060317003114.GA1735@sgi.com>
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> he generic request_irq/setup_irq code should support the SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag.
>
> Not sure why it was left out, but this patch adds that support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
>
> Index: linux/kernel/irq/manage.c
> =================================> --- linux.orig/kernel/irq/manage.c 2006-03-16 14:05:27.957927445 -0600
> +++ linux/kernel/irq/manage.c 2006-03-16 14:06:02.283661867 -0600
> @@ -201,6 +201,9 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
> * The following block of code has to be executed atomically
> */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock,flags);
> + if (new->flags & SA_PERCPU_IRQ) {
> + desc->status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
> + }
> p = &desc->action;
> if ((old = *p) != NULL) {
> /* Can't share interrupts unless both agree to */
Yes, we're presently going in and needlessly taking desc->lock on every
cpu-local interrupt. However it only appears to affect mmtimer.c at
present.
Shouldn't we also have a check in there, to make sure that all the other
handlers off this IRQ agree about the per-cpuness of this interrupt?
Your patch broke the x86 build, btw..
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
The generic request_irq/setup_irq code should support the SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag.
Also, check that all handlers agree to do per-cpu IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/irq/manage.c~generic-irq-add-sa_percpu_irq-flag-support kernel/irq/manage.c
--- 25/kernel/irq/manage.c~generic-irq-add-sa_percpu_irq-flag-support Fri Mar 17 15:06:44 2006
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/irq/manage.c Fri Mar 17 15:23:02 2006
@@ -204,10 +204,14 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
p = &desc->action;
if ((old = *p) != NULL) {
/* Can't share interrupts unless both agree to */
- if (!(old->flags & new->flags & SA_SHIRQ)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
- return -EBUSY;
- }
+ if (!(old->flags & new->flags & SA_SHIRQ))
+ goto mismatch;
+
+#ifdef ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+ /* All handlers must agree on per-cpuness */
+ if ((old->flags & IRQ_PER_CPU) != (new->flags & IRQ_PER_CPU))
+ goto mismatch;
+#endif
/* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
do {
@@ -219,6 +223,11 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
*p = new;
+#ifdef ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+ if (new->flags & SA_PERCPU_IRQ)
+ desc->status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
+#endif
+
if (!shared) {
desc->depth = 0;
desc->status &= ~(IRQ_DISABLED | IRQ_AUTODETECT |
@@ -236,6 +245,12 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
register_handler_proc(irq, new);
return 0;
+
+mismatch:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq handler mismatch\n", __FUNCTION__);
+ dump_stack();
+ return -EBUSY;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-17 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-17 0:31 [PATCH] Add SA_PERCPU_IRQ flag support Dimitri Sivanich
2006-03-17 2:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-17 23:26 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-18 9:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-20 14:17 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2006-03-20 14:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-20 14:25 ` Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060317152645.52112021.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox