* Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) [not found] <20080205021658.4422.83165.stgit@pacifica> @ 2008-02-05 21:03 ` Len Brown 2008-02-05 21:18 ` Carlos Corbacho 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Len Brown @ 2008-02-05 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos Corbacho Cc: linux-acpi, Matthew Garrett, Alexey Starikovskiy, linux-ia64 On Monday 04 February 2008 21:16, Carlos Corbacho wrote: > 2) Do you know of any IA64 systems using ACPI-WMI? At the moment, WMI will work > on x86 and hopefully IA64, but if it turns out that no vendor has or ever will > implement ACPI-WMI on IA64, then we could safely drop it there. I recommend skipping WMI on IA64 unless/until a real need to support it emerges. There are no WMI extensions on the Intel Tiger or Hitachi Fusion IA64 boxes I have access to. thanks, -Len ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) 2008-02-05 21:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) Len Brown @ 2008-02-05 21:18 ` Carlos Corbacho 2008-02-06 0:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Carlos Corbacho @ 2008-02-05 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Len Brown; +Cc: linux-acpi, Matthew Garrett, Alexey Starikovskiy, linux-ia64 On Tuesday 05 February 2008 21:03:30 Len Brown wrote: > On Monday 04 February 2008 21:16, Carlos Corbacho wrote: > > 2) Do you know of any IA64 systems using ACPI-WMI? At the moment, WMI > > will work on x86 and hopefully IA64, but if it turns out that no vendor > > has or ever will implement ACPI-WMI on IA64, then we could safely drop it > > there. > > I recommend skipping WMI on IA64 unless/until a real need to support it > emerges. There are no WMI extensions on the Intel Tiger or Hitachi Fusion > IA64 boxes I have access to. Ok. The only other vendors I really have in mind are HP and Fujitsu, since both those vendors use WMI on their laptops, so they would be my most likely candidates to have WMI on an IA64 box (if anyone actually does use WMI on IA64). Len: You can either add a 'depends on X86' to WMI when you apply patch #1 from the second WMI series; or I can send another patch out later on top of this series to do this, once you replace the old patches in acpi-test - whichever is easiest for you) -Carlos -- E-Mail: carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk Web: strangeworlds.co.uk GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) 2008-02-05 21:18 ` Carlos Corbacho @ 2008-02-06 0:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2008-02-06 2:03 ` Carlos Corbacho 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-02-06 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos Corbacho Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, Matthew Garrett, Alexey Starikovskiy, linux-ia64 On Tuesday 05 February 2008 02:18:01 pm Carlos Corbacho wrote: > On Tuesday 05 February 2008 21:03:30 Len Brown wrote: > > On Monday 04 February 2008 21:16, Carlos Corbacho wrote: > > > 2) Do you know of any IA64 systems using ACPI-WMI? At the moment, WMI > > > will work on x86 and hopefully IA64, but if it turns out that no vendor > > > has or ever will implement ACPI-WMI on IA64, then we could safely drop it > > > there. > > > > I recommend skipping WMI on IA64 unless/until a real need to support it > > emerges. There are no WMI extensions on the Intel Tiger or Hitachi Fusion > > IA64 boxes I have access to. > > Ok. The only other vendors I really have in mind are HP and Fujitsu, since > both those vendors use WMI on their laptops, so they would be my most likely > candidates to have WMI on an IA64 box (if anyone actually does use WMI on > IA64). How could I tell whether our HP systems use WMI? Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) 2008-02-06 0:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-02-06 2:03 ` Carlos Corbacho 2008-02-06 6:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Carlos Corbacho @ 2008-02-06 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, Matthew Garrett, Alexey Starikovskiy, linux-ia64 On Wednesday 06 February 2008 00:35:54 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Ok. The only other vendors I really have in mind are HP and Fujitsu, > > since both those vendors use WMI on their laptops, so they would be my > > most likely candidates to have WMI on an IA64 box (if anyone actually > > does use WMI on IA64). > > How could I tell whether our HP systems use WMI? Do you have any PNP0C14 or *pnp0c14 _HID objects defined in the DSDTs for your systems? If not, then your systems don't use WMI. -Carlos -- E-Mail: carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk Web: strangeworlds.co.uk GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) 2008-02-06 2:03 ` Carlos Corbacho @ 2008-02-06 6:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2008-02-06 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carlos Corbacho Cc: Len Brown, linux-acpi, Matthew Garrett, Alexey Starikovskiy, linux-ia64 On Tuesday 05 February 2008 07:03:23 pm Carlos Corbacho wrote: > On Wednesday 06 February 2008 00:35:54 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > Ok. The only other vendors I really have in mind are HP and Fujitsu, > > > since both those vendors use WMI on their laptops, so they would be my > > > most likely candidates to have WMI on an IA64 box (if anyone actually > > > does use WMI on IA64). > > > > How could I tell whether our HP systems use WMI? > > Do you have any PNP0C14 or *pnp0c14 _HID objects defined in the DSDTs for your > systems? If not, then your systems don't use WMI. I looked at DSDTs for a few HP ia64 systems (rx7620, rx8640, and superdome), and none has a PNP0C14 object. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-06 6:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080205021658.4422.83165.stgit@pacifica>
2008-02-05 21:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2) Len Brown
2008-02-05 21:18 ` Carlos Corbacho
2008-02-06 0:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-02-06 2:03 ` Carlos Corbacho
2008-02-06 6:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox