From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: minor Makefile simplification through use of cc-ifversion
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:25:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907250125.06102.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090724231511.GA20607@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Between GCC version 3.4.0 and 4.3.3 (including 3.4.0 and 4.3.3),
> -mtune=merced is implemented in GCC. Starting from 4.4.0, -mtune=merced
> is deprecated.
>
> Even implemented in versions between 3.4.0 and 4.3.3, the -mtune=merced
> feature has been broken in some of the versions. For example, GCC 4.1.2
> reports interanl tuning function errors during kernel building with
> -mtune=merced. Or GCC Bugzilla 16130 reports another -mtune=merced
> issue on GCC 3.4.1.
>
> So I would remove the -mtune=merced from IA64 kernel build. Without
> this option, kernel on Merced will remain the same except losing an
> unstable and out-of-date performance tunning feature.
>
> Since GCC version 3.4.0, -mtune=mckinley has been implemented. The
> -mtune=mckinley option functions the same as mtune=itanium2. And
> mtune=itanium2 is the default option. So we don't need to add
> mtune=mckinley either since its been the default option in any GCC
> version which implements this option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Fine by me, but you'll probably want to give the commit a different
subject :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-24 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-23 18:56 [PATCH] ia64: minor Makefile simplification through use of cc-ifversion Frans Pop
2009-07-23 21:28 ` [PATCH] ia64: minor Makefile simplification through use of Sam Ravnborg
2009-07-24 1:39 ` [PATCH] ia64: minor Makefile simplification through use of cc-ifversion Peter Chubb
2009-07-24 18:23 ` Frans Pop
2009-07-24 23:15 ` Fenghua Yu
2009-07-24 23:25 ` Frans Pop [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907250125.06102.elendil@planet.nl \
--to=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox