[PATCH v4] mm: Using for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open coding

[PATCH v4] mm: Using for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open coding

[Peng Liu]

Use more generic functions to deal with issues related to online
nodes. The changes will make the code simplified.

Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
v4:
 Clean up all the related issues in one patch as suggested by Andrew.

 arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c | 2 +-
 mm/hugetlb.c                | 4 ++--
 mm/page_ext.c               | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c
index 816803636a75..a0fec82c56b8 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int __init uncached_init(void)
 {
 	int nid;
 
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_ONLINE) {
+	for_each_online_node(nid) {
 		uncached_pools[nid].pool = gen_pool_create(PAGE_SHIFT, nid);
 		mutex_init(&uncached_pools[nid].add_chunk_mutex);
 	}
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 30e1099fd99a..0e5a7764efaa 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6951,7 +6951,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order)
 		if (hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid] = 0)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!node_state(nid, N_ONLINE)) {
+		if (!node_online(nid)) {
 			pr_warn("hugetlb_cma: invalid node %d specified\n", nid);
 			hugetlb_cma_size -= hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid];
 			hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid] = 0;
@@ -6990,7 +6990,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order)
 	}
 
 	reserved = 0;
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_ONLINE) {
+	for_each_online_node(nid) {
 		int res;
 		char name[CMA_MAX_NAME];
 
diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
index 2e66d934d63f..3dc715d7ac29 100644
--- a/mm/page_ext.c
+++ b/mm/page_ext.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int __meminit online_page_ext(unsigned long start_pfn,
 		 * online__pages(), and start_pfn should exist.
 		 */
 		nid = pfn_to_nid(start_pfn);
-		VM_BUG_ON(!node_state(nid, N_ONLINE));
+		VM_BUG_ON(!node_online(nid));
 	}
 
 	for (pfn = start; !fail && pfn < end; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION)
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v4] mm: Using for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open coding

[David Hildenbrand]

On 29.04.22 05:02, Peng Liu wrote:
> Use more generic functions to deal with issues related to online
> nodes. The changes will make the code simplified.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Re: [PATCH v4] mm: Using for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open coding

[Muchun Song]

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:02:18AM +0000, Peng Liu wrote:
> Use more generic functions to deal with issues related to online
> nodes. The changes will make the code simplified.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

Thanks.