bk pull on NEW ia64 linux tree

bk pull on NEW ia64 linux tree

[Tony Luck]

Hi Linus,

I'm still running with the training wheels attached to my bitkeeper
tree (and next time I'll use BK_USER/BK_HOST to get better patch
attributions inside bitkeeper ... plus I'll make the ChangeSet
commentary include the description as well as putting it into the
file revision history).

please do a

         bk pull http://lia64.bkbits.net/to-base-2.6

This will update the files shown below.

Thanks!

-Tony

  arch/ia64/ia32/ia32_entry.S |    4 ++--
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

through these ChangeSets:

<aegl@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com> (04/07/28 1.1855)
    #   Signed-off-by: Gordon Jin <gordon.jin@intel.com>
    #   Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
    #   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

Re: bk pull on NEW ia64 linux tree

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:26 am, Tony Luck wrote:
> <aegl@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com> (04/07/28 1.1855)
>     #   Signed-off-by: Gordon Jin <gordon.jin@intel.com>
>     #   Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
>     #   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

This changeset isn't very descriptive. :)  You have to both comment the 
individual files *and* the whole changeset when doing a checkin, since that 
makes the changeset overview (e.g. 
http://lia64.bkbits.net:8080/to-base-2.6/ChangeSet%40-3d?nav=index.html) much 
more useful.

Thanks,
Jesse

RE: bk pull on NEW ia64 linux tree

[Luck, Tony]

>On Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:26 am, Tony Luck wrote:
>> <aegl@agluck-lia64.sc.intel.com> (04/07/28 1.1855)
>>     #   Signed-off-by: Gordon Jin <gordon.jin@intel.com>
>>     #   Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
>>     #   Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>
>This changeset isn't very descriptive. :)  You have to both 
>comment the 
>individual files *and* the whole changeset when doing a 
>checkin, since that 
>makes the changeset overview (e.g. 
>http://lia64.bkbits.net:8080/to-base-2.6/ChangeSet%40-3d?nav=in
>dex.html) much more useful.

Thanks for the tips.  I'll probably make more goofs as I figure
out how to use BitKeeper effectively. I hope efficiently too, that
two-line change took me three days of elapsed time ... I need to
get a LOT faster at this :-)

-Tony