public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Latest Altix I/O code reorganization code
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:35:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412F54D4.2020905@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040827162127.A32090@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:14:23AM -0500, Patrick Gefre wrote:
> 
>>Patch 1 of 26
>>
>>This patch is too large for email see:
>>
>>ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/001-kill-files
> 
> 
> 
> Stoop again.  This absolutely does not look like a change after which the
> tree build, right?  After how many of the patches do we get a useable

Right

> kernel for SN2?  Please split your changes into LOGICAL steps, e.g.

26 - hence the 1 of 26

> 
>  - dma mapping rework
>  - usage of SAL interfaces
>  - hwgrpah removal
>  - renaming of files without code changes
>  - addition of new hardware support
>  - etc..
> 

The code was completely redone. It was not done in sections. Breaking them into
pieces is nothing more than an academic exercise. It is not useable until all
the code changes have been made because it would require a prom that followed these
changes.  The point of a review was to get comments on the CONTENT of the code not
the format of the patches.


> everything else is simply not reviewable. (and the above is intentionally
> an order which I think would make sense)

The easiest way to review is to delete the old directorory and apply the new ioif
files. Reviewing it as patches doesn't make any sense. The new code is very small and
it should be possible to look at it intact.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-27 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-04 20:14 Altix I/O code reorganization Pat Gefre
2004-08-05  0:31 ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-05 18:16 ` Greg KH
2004-08-05 20:51 ` Pat Gefre
2004-08-05 21:08   ` Greg KH
2004-08-05 21:32     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 21:36       ` Greg KH
2004-08-06 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-06 16:19   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-07 10:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 23:24   ` Patrick Gefre
2004-08-12  9:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-12 14:47       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-12 15:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 15:10     ` Latest Altix I/O code reorganization code Patrick Gefre
2004-08-27 15:14       ` Patrick Gefre
2004-08-27 15:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 15:35           ` Patrick Gefre [this message]
2004-08-27 15:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 15:23       ` Pat Gefre
2004-08-27 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 15:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 16:32         ` Patrick Gefre
2004-08-27 15:54       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 16:06         ` Patrick Gefre
2004-08-27 16:21         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-03 23:40           ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-07 22:10             ` Patrick Gefre
2004-09-07 22:16               ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-27 17:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-29  6:39       ` Keith Owens
2004-08-29  7:16         ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-29  7:22       ` Keith Owens
2004-08-06 13:51 ` Altix I/O code reorganization Keith Owens
2004-08-06 13:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-06 15:47 ` Russ Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412F54D4.2020905@sgi.com \
    --to=pfg@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox