public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Broadfoot, KenX" <kenx.broadfoot@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] Kernel: which machine to choose?
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 16:02:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590678205275@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590678205272@msgid-missing>

I use:

DIG-compliant
Enable Itanium A-step
Enable Itanium A1-step
Enable AzusA hacks
Enable IA64 Machine Check Abort
SMP support

----------------------------------------------------------------

I am not using SoftSDV hacks ( strange I know )
I compile SMP even for the single proc box. It just "seems" more stable.

My uptime is 4 days and 20 hours as of this writing.

--ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	G\351raud Krawezik [SMTP:gk@scali.no]
> Sent:	Tuesday, August 08, 2000 12:15 AM
> To:	linux-ia64@linuxia64.com
> Subject:	[Linux-ia64] Kernel: which machine to choose?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In order to use a kernel that support modules, I have downloaded
> 2.4.0-test5.
> There are four different kind of workstations available: Generic,
> HP-simulator, SN1, DIG Compliant.
> 
> HP-Sim crashes at the very beginning of the booting sequence
> SN1 cannot compile
> DIG compliant crashes while booting.
> 
> I'm ok to make minor modifications by myself to haev this fixed, but could
> someone tell me what version should I use? (from what I have seen, Generic
> uses all the others, so it does not compile and some definitions seem to
> be rather old...)
> I'm using an SDV from intel.
> 
> 
> Thanks by advance
> 
> 
> Geraud
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64



  reply	other threads:[~2000-08-08 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-08-08  7:14 [Linux-ia64] Kernel: which machine to choose? G\351raud Krawezik
2000-08-08 16:02 ` Broadfoot, KenX [this message]
2000-08-08 17:16 ` David Mosberger
2000-08-08 18:26 ` Uros Prestor
2000-08-08 18:51 ` David Mosberger
2000-08-08 18:55 ` Gerrit.Huizenga
2000-08-08 18:55 ` Jes Sorensen
2000-08-08 19:10 ` Jim Wilson
2000-08-08 19:15 ` Don Dugger
2000-08-08 19:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2000-08-08 19:43 ` Uros Prestor
2000-08-09 10:36 ` Gerrit.Huizenga
2000-08-09 16:37 ` Broadfoot, KenX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590678205275@msgid-missing \
    --to=kenx.broadfoot@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox