* [Linux-ia64] Re: gcc bug (2.9-ia64-000216-final)
@ 2000-10-03 0:26 Bill Nottingham
2000-10-03 0:46 ` Steve Tynor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Nottingham @ 2000-10-03 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Steve Tynor (tynor@atlanta.twr.com) said:
> Can someone verify that this bug is fixed in the latest toolchain?
Works for me. A quick glance at the code makes me think that building
with -fno-optimize-sibling-calls will work around it for now.
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* re: [Linux-ia64] Re: gcc bug (2.9-ia64-000216-final)
2000-10-03 0:26 [Linux-ia64] Re: gcc bug (2.9-ia64-000216-final) Bill Nottingham
@ 2000-10-03 0:46 ` Steve Tynor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve Tynor @ 2000-10-03 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Bill Nottingham wrote:
| Steve Tynor (tynor@atlanta.twr.com) said:
| > Can someone verify that this bug is fixed in the latest toolchain?
|
| Works for me. A quick glance at the code makes me think that building
| with -fno-optimize-sibling-calls will work around it for now.
FWIW: in 2.9-ia64-000216-final, that flag apparently does not yet exist:
impromptu:~/tmp/ia64bug> gcc -O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls ia64bug.c
cc1: Unrecognised option `-fno-optimize-sibling-calls'
impromptu:~/tmp/ia64bug> ./a.out
in main 9fffffffffffe960: 11 12
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
impromptu:~/tmp/ia64bug>
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-10-03 0:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-10-03 0:26 [Linux-ia64] Re: gcc bug (2.9-ia64-000216-final) Bill Nottingham
2000-10-03 0:46 ` Steve Tynor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox