* [Linux-ia64] gcc: thanks
@ 2000-11-16 16:35 Francis Galiegue
2000-11-16 17:16 ` H . J . Lu
2000-11-16 18:05 ` Francis Galiegue
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Francis Galiegue @ 2000-11-16 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Thanks to Jes Sorensen for enlightening me about the cause of the error, but
thanks above all to H. J. Lu for his patch. It has worked wonderfully.
FWIW, I compiled the 001024 snapshot will all RCS patches up to .033 and it
works like a charm. Now, on to glibc 2.2...
--
Francis Galiegue, fg@mandrakesoft.com
"Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more
idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable
idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] gcc: thanks
2000-11-16 16:35 [Linux-ia64] gcc: thanks Francis Galiegue
@ 2000-11-16 17:16 ` H . J . Lu
2000-11-16 18:05 ` Francis Galiegue
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2000-11-16 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 05:35:56PM +0100, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Thanks to Jes Sorensen for enlightening me about the cause of the error, but
> thanks above all to H. J. Lu for his patch. It has worked wonderfully.
>
> FWIW, I compiled the 001024 snapshot will all RCS patches up to .033 and it
> works like a charm. Now, on to glibc 2.2...
>
I have 2 patches to fix an ABI bug in binutils and glibc where the
DT_INIT/FINI entries should be the function address, not the function
descriptor. As of today, binutils and glibc assume they are function
addresses. My patches are at
http://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/ia64/bfd-init.patch
http://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/ia64/glibc-2.2-init.patch
They should be tested and checked in ASAP.
Thanks.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] gcc: thanks
2000-11-16 16:35 [Linux-ia64] gcc: thanks Francis Galiegue
2000-11-16 17:16 ` H . J . Lu
@ 2000-11-16 18:05 ` Francis Galiegue
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Francis Galiegue @ 2000-11-16 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, H . J . Lu wrote:
>
> I have 2 patches to fix an ABI bug in binutils and glibc where the
> DT_INIT/FINI entries should be the function address, not the function
> descriptor. As of today, binutils and glibc assume they are function
> addresses. My patches are at
>
> http://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/ia64/bfd-init.patch
> http://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/ia64/glibc-2.2-init.patch
>
> They should be tested and checked in ASAP.
>
Downloaded, will test tomorrow. Thanks.
--
Francis Galiegue, fg@mandrakesoft.com
"Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more
idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable
idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-11-16 18:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-11-16 16:35 [Linux-ia64] gcc: thanks Francis Galiegue
2000-11-16 17:16 ` H . J . Lu
2000-11-16 18:05 ` Francis Galiegue
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox