From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] /proc/pid/mem and stack variables
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 02:29:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005040@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005037@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:45:10 -0500, Pete Wyckoff <pw@osc.edu> said:
Pete> maciej@ccrl-nece.technopark.gmd.de said:
>> I have recompiled the library on IA64 under 2.4.0-test12 and
>> using version 2.9-ia64-000216-final. The library works OK except
>> when the address it tries to access via /proc/pid/mem refers to
>> variables allocated on stack (e.g. local arrays defined in
>> functions).
>>
>> This is a snippet of code used to access memory via
>> /proc/pid/mem:
>>
>> void mem_read (int fd, void *buf, void *addr, size_t len) {
>>
>> if (lseek (fd, (off_t)addr, SEEK_SET) = (off_t)-1) perror
>> ("lseek"); read (fd, buf, len);
>>
>> lseek in this code fails (EINVAL) always when addr is address of
>> a variable allocated on stack.
Pete> Try removing the "offset >= 0" check in default_llseek in
Pete> fs/read_write.c. Stack pages seem to have the high bit set
Pete> which is flummoxing that test.
Pete> If you keep this "solution" you may want to write an llseek
Pete> function for /proc/pid/mem so that the entire kernel doesn't
Pete> suffer any unforseen consequences.
Yes, implementing llseek for fs/proc/base.c:proc_mem_operations is the
right solution. /dev/kmem already has its own llseek (which treats
the offset as unsigned) but, for some reason, was left out of the
/proc/pid/mem support.
Don, can you add this to the TODO list so we won't forget about it?
Thanks,
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-13 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-12 16:20 [Linux-ia64] /proc/pid/mem and stack variables Maciej Golebiewski
2001-01-12 18:45 ` Pete Wyckoff
2001-01-13 2:29 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2001-01-15 10:17 ` Maciej Golebiewski
2001-01-15 17:57 ` Erich Focht
2001-01-18 2:48 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005040@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox