public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 23:26:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905559@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905293@msgid-missing>

> I think it would be interesting to see a discontig patch which leaves
> out all the NUMA stuff.  I really believe it would actually help clean
> up that patch a lot.

Without using a virtual mem_map, it would still have many of the warts.
The trickiest part is making sure that "virt_to_page()" is implemented
efficiently ... and with no constraints on how the physical memory can be
arranged on a DIG platform this becomes a hard problem (which we evaded
with the discontigmem patch by pushing some of the macros into platform
dependent files, and having our hardcoded limits ... clumps per node etc).

Now that you have virtual mem_map working, it will be interesting to look
at whether it adds significantly to TLB pressure (or has a measureable
impact on any other performance measurement).  If it doesn't, then it
becomes a viable way to clean up the discontig/numa code, so long as we
can persuade the platform designers to keep their hands off the very high
order physical bits. SGI/sn2 physical memory layout (which is the current
worst case that I'm aware of) will be able to fit the virtual mem_map it
needs into region 5 (2^42 bytes ... works ok unless you want to use a 4K
page size).

-Tony


      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-05-08 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-15  5:02 [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.7-pre1) David Mosberger
2002-04-10 21:42 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18) David Mosberger
2002-04-10 22:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2002-04-11 18:22 ` Chris McDermott
2002-04-11 20:04 ` Saxena, Sunil
2002-04-11 23:49 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3) David Mosberger
2002-04-12  0:46 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  0:49 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-12  1:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-04-12  1:04 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  2:15 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-12  3:50 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  4:43 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  5:31 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-22  7:02 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18) Zach, Yoav
2002-04-22 14:47 ` n0ano
2002-04-22 14:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-22 15:34 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-22 15:40 ` n0ano
2002-05-02 17:41 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-05-03  7:35 ` Ross Elliott
2002-05-03 17:23 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-03 23:36 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-05-08 17:49 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 18:25 ` Luck, Tony
2002-05-08 19:21 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 19:43 ` Jack Steiner
2002-05-08 20:29 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 23:26 ` Luck, Tony [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905559@msgid-missing \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox