public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:43:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905440@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905293@msgid-missing>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:31:04PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:50:35 -0700, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> said:
> 
>   Greg> There is a uhci.c (sorry, meant to say this, instead of
>   Greg> usb-uhci.c) change in the patch you just posted on kernel.org.
>   Greg> Your diffstat says there is also a change to usb-ohci.c, but
>   Greg> that doesn't show up in your patch.
> 
> This is really bugging you, eh? ;-)

Heh, yeah it is.  As the usb maintainer, I like it if people who have
patches to the subsystem let me know about it :)

>   Greg> Is there a bk tree somewhere I can clone that matches up with
>   Greg> your working tree right now?  I'd like to get that usb patch
>   Greg> out of there :)
> 
> No, the lia64 patch is a union of about a dozen bk trees.  I'm
> chipping away one tree after another, as Linus merges stuff, until at
> the end only to-linus-2.5 is left.  I did make the union tree
> available in the past, but it was a pain to maintain (it's a throwaway
> tree and bkbits.net isn't well setup to handle that, as far as I can
> tell).
> 
> Anyhow, I modified the tree containing the temporary hacks to omit the
> uhci.c change.  I'm not sure whether the comment will be gone (I
> suspect not, given bk's tendency never to forget anything), but the
> patch should be correct.

Thanks for doing this.

greg k-h


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-12  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-15  5:02 [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.7-pre1) David Mosberger
2002-04-10 21:42 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18) David Mosberger
2002-04-10 22:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2002-04-11 18:22 ` Chris McDermott
2002-04-11 20:04 ` Saxena, Sunil
2002-04-11 23:49 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3) David Mosberger
2002-04-12  0:46 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  0:49 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-12  1:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-04-12  1:04 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  2:15 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-12  3:50 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  4:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-04-12  5:31 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-22  7:02 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18) Zach, Yoav
2002-04-22 14:47 ` n0ano
2002-04-22 14:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-22 15:34 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-22 15:40 ` n0ano
2002-05-02 17:41 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-05-03  7:35 ` Ross Elliott
2002-05-03 17:23 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-03 23:36 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-05-08 17:49 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 18:25 ` Luck, Tony
2002-05-08 19:21 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 19:43 ` Jack Steiner
2002-05-08 20:29 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 23:26 ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905440@msgid-missing \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox