[Linux-ia64] Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] random ia64 acpi fixes

[Linux-ia64] Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] random ia64 acpi fixes

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> Won't build on ia64 without this change.

This one is wrong. You should create empty include/asm/save_state.h instead.

									Pavel
> 
> diff -urNX ../dontdiff linux-2418/drivers/acpi/system.c linux-acpi/drivers/acpi/system.c
> --- linux-2418/drivers/acpi/system.c	Wed Jun 12 09:08:54 2002
> +++ linux-acpi/drivers/acpi/system.c	Wed Jun 12 07:20:26 2002
> @@ -37,7 +37,9 @@
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#ifdef __i386__
>  #include <asm/save_state.h>
> +#endif
>  #include "acpi_bus.h"
>  #include "acpi_drivers.h"
>  
> 
> -- 
> It's always legal to use Linux (TM) systems
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Sponsored by:
> ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> Acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel

-- 
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

RE: [Linux-ia64] Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] random ia64 acpi fixes

[Grover, Andrew]

> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@suse.cz] 
> > Won't build on ia64 without this change.
> 
> This one is wrong. You should create empty 
> include/asm/save_state.h instead.

Feh, introducing save_state.h to begin with was probably a mistake by me.

(the intention was that save_state.h was a better name than suspend.h since
that was actually what the stuff in suspend.h did - save CPU state, but in
retrospect, it was probably not worth doing)

-- Andy

Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] random ia64 acpi fixes

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > Won't build on ia64 without this change.
> > 
> > This one is wrong. You should create empty 
> > include/asm/save_state.h instead.
> 
> Feh, introducing save_state.h to begin with was probably a mistake by me.
> 
> (the intention was that save_state.h was a better name than suspend.h since
> that was actually what the stuff in suspend.h did - save CPU state, but in
> retrospect, it was probably not worth doing)

Agreed, I like suspend.h better.
									Pavel
-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa