public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Linux-ia64] Re: +-AFs-Linux-ia64+-AF0- reader-writer livelock proble
@ 2002-11-11 21:46 Mario Smarduch
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mario Smarduch @ 2002-11-11 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ia64

David Mosberger wrote:

> >>>>> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:36:38 -0600, "Van Maren, Kevin" <kevin.vanmaren@unisys.com> said:
>
>   Van> I have not looked at this, but I don't believe it is the right
>   Van> way to solve the problem: users who _need_ to use all
>   Van> the CPUs for computation would be punished just to work around
>   Van> a kernel implementation issue: that's like saying don't allow
>   Van> processes to allocate virtual memory because if the VM is
>   Van> over-committed by X amount the kernel deadlocks.
>
>   Van> It would be a bad hack to limit the system-call rate just to
>   Van> prevent livelock.
>
> Certainly.  I didn't suggest PRM as a way to _solve_ the livelock
> problem, but since Mario asked for a method to cap CPU utilization, I
> mentiond it.
>
>         --david

Absolutelly its not a method to solve the problem.  As a matter of fact
its just a first approach that came to mind to protect the system.
It could be any other viable way before a final fix.
Like I said in the previous email you're not going to sell too many
high end servers to a customer aware of this issue without a contingency plan.

- Mario.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-11-11 21:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-11 21:46 [Linux-ia64] Re: +-AFs-Linux-ia64+-AF0- reader-writer livelock proble Mario Smarduch

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox