* [Linux-ia64] Re: backtrace()...
@ 2002-12-09 16:37 David Mosberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2002-12-09 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On 09 Dec 2002 15:33:37 +0100, Fons Rademakers <Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch> said:
Fons> Hi David, I try to use backtrace() (/usr/include/execinfo.h)
Fons> but it returns nothing meaningfull (one 0 stackframe). This is
Fons> on Itanium2:
Fons> Kernel 2.4.18-e.4smp glibc-2.2.4-29.2
Fons> Is this expected or should I do something special?
Yes, the backtrace() in glibc is hopeless. libunwind implements a
working version of backtrace() (see
http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/libunwind/).
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-12-09 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-09 16:37 [Linux-ia64] Re: backtrace() David Mosberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox