public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Linux-ia64] UML support for Itanium?
@ 2003-01-15 20:14 Wichmann, Mats D
  2003-01-15 20:19 ` David Mosberger
  2003-01-16  1:46 ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wichmann, Mats D @ 2003-01-15 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ia64

I've been meaning to ask the question, but
never seem to get around to it.


Now that the UML "support" bits are in Linus'
2.5 tree, isn't it time to get more serious
about UML for Itanium?

Every now and then it seems someone pops up
who takes a whack at it, and then after a
while there's no further word....

UML (despite the acronym overloading) makes
a pretty handy test environment, you can
sandbox all sort of experiments that might
be somewhat intrusive otherwise.  For example,
I use it on ia32 to run a restricted
(LSB-only) environment for application 
conformance testing.

Folks have developed ways to build/test
driver code without rebuilding/rebooting
the host kernel, as a jail for web applications,
and so on.

Thoughts?






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Linux-ia64] UML support for Itanium?
  2003-01-15 20:14 [Linux-ia64] UML support for Itanium? Wichmann, Mats D
@ 2003-01-15 20:19 ` David Mosberger
  2003-01-16  1:46 ` Jeff Dike
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-01-15 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ia64

>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:14:50 -0800, "Wichmann, Mats D" <mats.d.wichmann@intel.com> said:

  Mats> Now that the UML "support" bits are in Linus' 2.5 tree, isn't
  Mats> it time to get more serious about UML for Itanium?

Check this discussion.  Should be of interest to you:

	http://www.gelato.org/community/reply.php?entry\x103

  --david


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Linux-ia64] UML support for Itanium?
  2003-01-15 20:14 [Linux-ia64] UML support for Itanium? Wichmann, Mats D
  2003-01-15 20:19 ` David Mosberger
@ 2003-01-16  1:46 ` Jeff Dike
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2003-01-16  1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ia64

mats.d.wichmann@intel.com said:
> Now that the UML "support" bits are in Linus' 2.5 tree, 

It's not just UML support.  All of UML is there.

> isn't it time to get more serious about UML for Itanium? 

If this is more than a personal desire on your part, and Intel has some
desire for UML/IA64 and is willing to throw some money at the problem, then
I can certainly talk about contracting to do it.

				Jeff



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-16  1:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-15 20:14 [Linux-ia64] UML support for Itanium? Wichmann, Mats D
2003-01-15 20:19 ` David Mosberger
2003-01-16  1:46 ` Jeff Dike

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox