From: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_02
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:18:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805892@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805884@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 527 bytes --]
Matt Domsch wrote:
> > We'll issue a clarification on this topic. For now, can we have parted
> > revert to GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_00 ?
>
> No objections. Will you be submitting a patch, or should I?
>
The attached patch worked fine for me. When looking at a GPT with
revision number 1.02, parted complains about a newer version number it
doesn't know about, but if the user ignores it and flips a flag on one
of the GPT partitions twice (essentially a nop), the GPT revision number
gets downgraded to 1.0.
-Arun
[-- Attachment #2: gpt_ver.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1099 bytes --]
--- parted-1.6.3/libparted/disk_gpt.c- 2003-02-20 11:04:41.000000000 -0800
+++ parted-1.6.3/libparted/disk_gpt.c 2003-02-20 11:06:35.000000000 -0800
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@
#define MSDOS_MBR_SIGNATURE 0xaa55
#define GPT_HEADER_SIGNATURE 0x5452415020494645
-#define GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_02 0x00010200
#define GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_00 0x00010000
#define GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V0_99 0x00009900
@@ -458,7 +457,7 @@
PED_ASSERT (_header_is_valid (gpt), return 0);
#ifndef DISCOVER_ONLY
- if (PED_CPU_TO_LE32 (gpt->Revision) > GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_02
+ if (PED_CPU_TO_LE32 (gpt->Revision) > GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_00
|| PED_CPU_TO_LE32 (gpt->HeaderSize) != 92) {
if (ped_exception_throw (
PED_EXCEPTION_WARNING,
@@ -702,7 +701,7 @@
memset (gpt, 0, sizeof (GuidPartitionTableHeader_t));
gpt->Signature = PED_CPU_TO_LE64 (GPT_HEADER_SIGNATURE);
- gpt->Revision = PED_CPU_TO_LE32 (GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_02);
+ gpt->Revision = PED_CPU_TO_LE32 (GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_00);
gpt->HeaderSize = PED_CPU_TO_LE32 (92); /* per 1.02 spec */
gpt->HeaderCRC32 = 0;
gpt->Reserved1 = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-20 3:28 [Linux-ia64] Re: GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_02 Matt Domsch
2003-02-20 19:18 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2003-02-23 11:41 ` Andrew Clausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805892@msgid-missing \
--to=arun.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox