* [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed
@ 2003-03-14 15:08 Raj Patil
2003-03-14 16:52 ` Stephane Eranian
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raj Patil @ 2003-03-14 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1482 bytes --]
Hello,
I am not sure whether this is the right group for me to ask this or get the
kind of information I am looking for. I apologize if this is not the
right group. I am relatively new to Linux/ia64 and this question is related
to ia64. Hence, decided to post it here
I am looking for some info on how to set/unset the gp pointer, locations/cases
where I need to set and any other issues I need to worry. Any pointers to
some documentation or sample code or notes will be really appreciated.
Reason: I am just trying to port an utility to ia64 based Linux platform from
x86 platform. It adds an entry to syscall table to point to a function in
a module. It is like adding a new temp syscall for a small duration.
By looking at some documentation, I realized that I need to set
the gp pointer correctly before calling the function (not sure exactly wehre
and how). So, I am looking for some docs/notes which clarify my doubts like
-what in general needs to be done to set/reset gp (where?).
-Does this need to be done if one is adding an entry to ia32 syscall
table too?
-If this new function in the module calls other kernel functions in between,
should it worry about gp pointer before calling the kernel functions etc.
I have access to RH Advanced Server 2.1 running on an HP Itanium-2 box.
Thank you very much for any pointers/info.
Regards,
Raj
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1734 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed
2003-03-14 15:08 [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed Raj Patil
@ 2003-03-14 16:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2003-03-14 17:17 ` David Mosberger
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2003-03-14 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Raj,
Take a look at the software calling convention document at:
http://developer.intel.com/design/itanium/downloads/245358.htm
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 07:08:51AM -0800, Raj Patil wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure whether this is the right group for me to ask this or get the
>
> kind of information I am looking for. I apologize if this is not the
>
> right group. I am relatively new to Linux/ia64 and this question is related
>
> to ia64. Hence, decided to post it here
>
> I am looking for some info on how to set/unset the gp pointer, locations/cases
>
> where I need to set and any other issues I need to worry. Any pointers to
>
> some documentation or sample code or notes will be really appreciated.
>
> Reason: I am just trying to port an utility to ia64 based Linux platform from
>
> x86 platform. It adds an entry to syscall table to point to a function in
>
> a module. It is like adding a new temp syscall for a small duration.
>
> By looking at some documentation, I realized that I need to set
>
> the gp pointer correctly before calling the function (not sure exactly wehre
>
> and how). So, I am looking for some docs/notes which clarify my doubts like
>
> -what in general needs to be done to set/reset gp (where?).
>
> -Does this need to be done if one is adding an entry to ia32 syscall
>
> table too?
>
> -If this new function in the module calls other kernel functions in between,
>
> should it worry about gp pointer before calling the kernel functions etc.
>
> I have access to RH Advanced Server 2.1 running on an HP Itanium-2 box.
>
> Thank you very much for any pointers/info.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raj
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
--
-Stephane
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed
2003-03-14 15:08 [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed Raj Patil
2003-03-14 16:52 ` Stephane Eranian
@ 2003-03-14 17:17 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 17:56 ` Raj Patil
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-03-14 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:08:51 -0800 (PST), Raj Patil <rpatil0296@yahoo.com> said:
Raj> Reason: I am just trying to port an utility to ia64 based Linux
Raj> platform from x86 platform. It adds an entry to syscall table
Raj> to point to a function in a module. It is like adding a new
Raj> temp syscall for a small duration.
Is the module open-source? If not, you run the risk of violating the
kernel's GPL license (binary-only modules are OK but only as long as
they use "standard" kernel interfaces; planting a syscall-hook goes
beyond that).
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed
2003-03-14 15:08 [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed Raj Patil
2003-03-14 16:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2003-03-14 17:17 ` David Mosberger
@ 2003-03-14 17:56 ` Raj Patil
2003-03-14 19:41 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-15 1:27 ` Keith Owens
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raj Patil @ 2003-03-14 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]
I will check the source of this tool/module......
But, curious: You mean, one can not legally add a new syscall or hook?
This process as such does not use/modify the kernel source....
Regards,
Raj.
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:08:51 -0800 (PST), Raj Patil said:
Raj> Reason: I am just trying to port an utility to ia64 based Linux
Raj> platform from x86 platform. It adds an entry to syscall table
Raj> to point to a function in a module. It is like adding a new
Raj> temp syscall for a small duration.
Is the module open-source? If not, you run the risk of violating the
kernel's GPL license (binary-only modules are OK but only as long as
they use "standard" kernel interfaces; planting a syscall-hook goes
beyond that).
--david
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1221 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed
2003-03-14 15:08 [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed Raj Patil
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-03-14 17:56 ` Raj Patil
@ 2003-03-14 19:41 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-15 1:27 ` Keith Owens
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-03-14 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:56:12 -0800 (PST), Raj Patil <rpatil0296@yahoo.com> said:
Raj> I will check the source of this tool/module...... But,
Raj> curious: You mean, one can not legally add a new syscall or
Raj> hook?
I don't want to appear to be giving legal advise, so I'd recommend to
consult with your legal counsel to get a definite answer (or you can
ask for opinions on the lkml; preferably _after_ donning an asbestos
suit).
BTW: dynamically installing syscalls/hooks is a bad idea even for Open
Source modules. It's just not a safe thing to do. If you need a
syscall, argue why it's needed and why it's a good idea and if the
kernel developers concur, there will be no problem getting it
added/reserved.
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed
2003-03-14 15:08 [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed Raj Patil
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-03-14 19:41 ` David Mosberger
@ 2003-03-15 1:27 ` Keith Owens
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Owens @ 2003-03-15 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:41:57 -0800,
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:56:12 -0800 (PST), Raj Patil <rpatil0296@yahoo.com> said:
>
> Raj> I will check the source of this tool/module...... But,
> Raj> curious: You mean, one can not legally add a new syscall or
> Raj> hook?
>
>I don't want to appear to be giving legal advise, so I'd recommend to
>consult with your legal counsel to get a definite answer (or you can
>ask for opinions on the lkml; preferably _after_ donning an asbestos
>suit).
Even beyond legal - Linus has stated (several times) that he will not
accept code that patches the syscall table. Linus hates the idea of
dynamic syscalls.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-15 1:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-14 15:08 [Linux-ia64] How to set/reset gp pointer : info needed Raj Patil
2003-03-14 16:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2003-03-14 17:17 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 17:56 ` Raj Patil
2003-03-14 19:41 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-15 1:27 ` Keith Owens
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox