From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:24:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806115@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806101@msgid-missing>
Peter Chubb has been working on adding preemption support to 2.5. I
applied his patch in the 2.5.64 patch. I'm sure he would appreciate
more people beating on it.
--david
>>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:21:21 -0600, Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com> said:
Mario> Hi, we're trying to build a reliable low-latency system for
Mario> use in telco call processing carrier grade environments (on
Mario> rx2600 NEBS like servers) . One of the patches we're heavily
Mario> relying on is the 'Kernel Preemption' patch. First of we're
Mario> interested in the (i) status of this patch on IA-64 (ii) any
Mario> issues that you may have ran into.
Mario> Our understanding is that the 'Preemption Patch' offers a
Mario> systematic scheduling checkpoint vs. 'low latency patch'
Mario> which examines the kernel for any long running code and based
Mario> on that preemption checks are inserted in the kernel proper
Mario> only (kernel.org) but addon packages may introduce long
Mario> latencies. While we plan to run with 1mS clock tick, low
Mario> latency and the preemption paches, the preemption patch is
Mario> viewed as a must to gurantee a bound on 'soft-realtime
Mario> response'. Please point out if these assumption are somewhat
Mario> correct or is too much emphasis being placed on the
Mario> preemption patch, the soft-realtime response we're looking
Mario> for is 1mS.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-14 17:21 [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64 Mario Smarduch
2003-03-14 21:24 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-03-14 21:32 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-14 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-03-14 21:57 ` Peter Chubb
2003-03-14 22:07 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 22:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-17 18:11 ` jim
2003-03-27 23:31 ` Mario Smarduch
2003-03-27 23:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-28 3:58 ` Peter Chubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709806115@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox