From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:32:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806116@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806101@msgid-missing>
Just FYI, I tried 2.5.64 out on my Bug Sur, and it seems to work ok
with the following exceptions:
o the AT keyboard support seems broken (characters are slow to show
up on the screen and are sometimes repeated)
o agp support for 460GX causes a link failure
But by using a USB keyboard and turning off agp support, I was able to
get an SMP+preempt kernel going, and it seems fine.
Jesse
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:24:44PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> Peter Chubb has been working on adding preemption support to 2.5. I
> applied his patch in the 2.5.64 patch. I'm sure he would appreciate
> more people beating on it.
>
> --david
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:21:21 -0600, Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com> said:
>
> Mario> Hi, we're trying to build a reliable low-latency system for
> Mario> use in telco call processing carrier grade environments (on
> Mario> rx2600 NEBS like servers) . One of the patches we're heavily
> Mario> relying on is the 'Kernel Preemption' patch. First of we're
> Mario> interested in the (i) status of this patch on IA-64 (ii) any
> Mario> issues that you may have ran into.
>
> Mario> Our understanding is that the 'Preemption Patch' offers a
> Mario> systematic scheduling checkpoint vs. 'low latency patch'
> Mario> which examines the kernel for any long running code and based
> Mario> on that preemption checks are inserted in the kernel proper
> Mario> only (kernel.org) but addon packages may introduce long
> Mario> latencies. While we plan to run with 1mS clock tick, low
> Mario> latency and the preemption paches, the preemption patch is
> Mario> viewed as a must to gurantee a bound on 'soft-realtime
> Mario> response'. Please point out if these assumption are somewhat
> Mario> correct or is too much emphasis being placed on the
> Mario> preemption patch, the soft-realtime response we're looking
> Mario> for is 1mS.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-14 17:21 [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64 Mario Smarduch
2003-03-14 21:24 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 21:32 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2003-03-14 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-03-14 21:57 ` Peter Chubb
2003-03-14 22:07 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 22:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-17 18:11 ` jim
2003-03-27 23:31 ` Mario Smarduch
2003-03-27 23:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-28 3:58 ` Peter Chubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709806116@msgid-missing \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox