public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:32:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806116@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806101@msgid-missing>

Just FYI, I tried 2.5.64 out on my Bug Sur, and it seems to work ok
with the following exceptions:
  o the AT keyboard support seems broken (characters are slow to show
    up on the screen and are sometimes repeated)
  o agp support for 460GX causes a link failure

But by using a USB keyboard and turning off agp support, I was able to
get an SMP+preempt kernel going, and it seems fine.

Jesse

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:24:44PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> Peter Chubb has been working on adding preemption support to 2.5.  I
> applied his patch in the 2.5.64 patch.  I'm sure he would appreciate
> more people beating on it.
> 
> 	--david
> 
> >>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:21:21 -0600, Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com> said:
> 
>   Mario> Hi, we're trying to build a reliable low-latency system for
>   Mario> use in telco call processing carrier grade environments (on
>   Mario> rx2600 NEBS like servers) . One of the patches we're heavily
>   Mario> relying on is the 'Kernel Preemption' patch. First of we're
>   Mario> interested in the (i) status of this patch on IA-64 (ii) any
>   Mario> issues that you may have ran into.
> 
>   Mario> Our understanding is that the 'Preemption Patch' offers a
>   Mario> systematic scheduling checkpoint vs. 'low latency patch'
>   Mario> which examines the kernel for any long running code and based
>   Mario> on that preemption checks are inserted in the kernel proper
>   Mario> only (kernel.org) but addon packages may introduce long
>   Mario> latencies. While we plan to run with 1mS clock tick, low
>   Mario> latency and the preemption paches, the preemption patch is
>   Mario> viewed as a must to gurantee a bound on 'soft-realtime
>   Mario> response'.  Please point out if these assumption are somewhat
>   Mario> correct or is too much emphasis being placed on the
>   Mario> preemption patch, the soft-realtime response we're looking
>   Mario> for is 1mS.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-14 17:21 [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64 Mario Smarduch
2003-03-14 21:24 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 21:32 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2003-03-14 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-03-14 21:57 ` Peter Chubb
2003-03-14 22:07 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 22:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-17 18:11 ` jim
2003-03-27 23:31 ` Mario Smarduch
2003-03-27 23:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-28  3:58 ` Peter Chubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709806116@msgid-missing \
    --to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox