* Re: [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC
2003-03-24 10:41 [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC Adriano Galano
@ 2003-03-24 12:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-24 12:23 ` Adriano Galano
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2003-03-24 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:41:18AM +0100, Adriano Galano wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I read that IA-64 support PA-RISC instruction mapping. That's mean that I
> can use Linux for PA/RISC (http://www.parisc-linux.org/) in a Itanium 2
> computer?
No. You certainly can't run a PA-RISC kernel on an IA64 box, just like
you can't run an x86 kernel on an ia64 box.
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* RE: [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC
2003-03-24 10:41 [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC Adriano Galano
2003-03-24 12:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2003-03-24 12:23 ` Adriano Galano
2003-03-24 12:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-24 19:19 ` David Mosberger
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adriano Galano @ 2003-03-24 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
Hi Matthew and *:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:41:18AM +0100, Adriano Galano wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I read that IA-64 support PA-RISC instruction mapping.
> That's mean that I
> > can use Linux for PA/RISC (http://www.parisc-linux.org/) in
> a Itanium 2
> > computer?
>
> No. You certainly can't run a PA-RISC kernel on an IA64 box,
> just like
> you can't run an x86 kernel on an ia64 box.
>
Sorry for my newbie questions but:
If IPF support PA-RISC mapping is not easy to "port" the PA/RISC Linux,
excluding architectural changes in the chipset or booting process?
How HP/UX v 11.6 could be offer compatibility between PA/RISC and Itanium 2
systems?
How "exact" is the PA-RISC mapping on the IA-64 core?
> --
> "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about
> defeat or
> victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and
> thousands of dead bodies.
> Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this
> subject?" -- Robert Fisk
Regards,
-Adriano (bryam)
--
Adriano M. Galano Diez
System & Network Engineer
http://www.satec.es
Phone: (+34) 917 089 000
Sourceforge.NET Linux Kernel Foundry Guide http://sf.net/foundry/linuxkernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC
2003-03-24 10:41 [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC Adriano Galano
2003-03-24 12:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-24 12:23 ` Adriano Galano
@ 2003-03-24 12:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-24 19:19 ` David Mosberger
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2003-03-24 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:23:32PM +0100, Adriano Galano wrote:
> If IPF support PA-RISC mapping is not easy to "port" the PA/RISC Linux,
> excluding architectural changes in the chipset or booting process?
Why would you want to? ia64 already has its own perfectly good Linux port.
> How HP/UX v 11.6 could be offer compatibility between PA/RISC and Itanium 2
> systems?
That's `11i v1.6'. Quoting from
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/operating/choice/hp-ux11i_details.html
PA-RISC binary compatibility
HP-UX 11i version 1.6 includes the Aries dynamic code translation
technology as an integrated component. Aries is built on the close
relationship between the PA-RISC and Intel Itanium instruction sets
and provides binary compatibility for PA-RISC binaries on the Itanium
processor family. Aries can be used where performance is not critical
or where it is not possible to create a native Itanium processor
family binary.
> How "exact" is the PA-RISC mapping on the IA-64 core?
Not particularly close. If you look at the assembly language level,
there's a lot of similarities, but there's a lot of differences too.
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC
2003-03-24 10:41 [Linux-ia64] Linux, Itanium and PA/RISC Adriano Galano
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-03-24 12:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2003-03-24 19:19 ` David Mosberger
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-03-24 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:10:37 +0000, Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> said:
Matthew> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:41:18AM +0100, Adriano Galano
Matthew> wrote:
>> Hi all:
>> I read that IA-64 support PA-RISC instruction mapping. That's
>> mean that I can use Linux for PA/RISC
>> (http://www.parisc-linux.org/) in a Itanium 2 computer?
Matthew> No. You certainly can't run a PA-RISC kernel on an IA64
Matthew> box, just like you can't run an x86 kernel on an ia64 box.
Ugh, that's not strictly true. You definitely can boot x86 linux and
windows 98 on Itanium. I believe the same is true for Itanium 2 if
you have Intel's firmware, though I have never tried that myself.
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread