public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:54:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705484@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705464@msgid-missing>

David Mosberger wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:49:35 +1000, Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au> said:
> 
>   Duraid> My point wasn't that software simulators are useless, but
>   Duraid> that software simulators _should_ be useless **4 years**
>   Duraid> (!!) after the public availability of hardware.
> 
> Then how do you explain the popularity of user-mode linux on x86?

If user-mode linux is "popular", then linux is "f@#%g buggy s#!t". I 
mean really, when your attitude to software development is:

	<Linus> hey somethings wrong my swap is full what gives????
	<Rik Riel> stop running 91589 copies of XMMS 8)
	<Linus> shut up riel god i hate you
	** Riel is banned from linux-kernel
	<Andrea> YO CHECK OUT THE NEW VM SYSTEM I WROTE THIS 
MORNING^H^H^H^H^H^H^HWEEK!! ITLL FIX YOUR PROBLEMS!!!!
	<Linus> k i know 2.4 is supposed to be a "stable" kernel but god i hate 
that riel dude!! :| welp.. out with the old, in with the new!!!!!
	** Linus integrates new VM
	<Andrea> THANKS D00D
	<Linus> no probs m8

	..then yes, having UML as a sandbox can help.

The UML guys see it differently though. According to them: "It doesn't 
need to be good for anything. It's fun!" Maybe Ski can embrace this 
spirit also. ;)

  > The reason I continue to use Ski is because it's one of the very few
> simulators out there that are (a) architecturally extremely accurate,
> (b) fast, and (c) very easy to setup & use.  Ski is an asset for ia64
> linux, not a weakness.
> 
> (And no, just because we have Ski doesn't mean we don't use real
>  hardware.  Nothing could be further from the truth.)

That's right - _you_ use real hardware because you actually have it. 
Everyone else (figuratively speaking, though it's not far off the mark) 
has no choice _but_ to use Ski. That sucks, regardless of whether or not 
Ski is accurate, fast, or easy to use.

Anyway, I don't think there's much more that can be said. As Matt 
indicated, we must pray for Deerfield, so I will continue to align my 
holy carpet of hope to Fort Collins/Portland/Carly's hotel bedroom and 
pray for reasonably priced IA64 hardware.

	Duraid



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-11 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-11  7:51 [Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software David Kågedal
2003-04-11 20:49 ` Duraid Madina
2003-04-11 22:08 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-11 22:54 ` Duraid Madina [this message]
2003-04-11 23:05 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-12 15:50 ` David Kågedal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705484@msgid-missing \
    --to=duraid@octopus.com.au \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox