From: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:54:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705484@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705464@msgid-missing>
David Mosberger wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:49:35 +1000, Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au> said:
>
> Duraid> My point wasn't that software simulators are useless, but
> Duraid> that software simulators _should_ be useless **4 years**
> Duraid> (!!) after the public availability of hardware.
>
> Then how do you explain the popularity of user-mode linux on x86?
If user-mode linux is "popular", then linux is "f@#%g buggy s#!t". I
mean really, when your attitude to software development is:
<Linus> hey somethings wrong my swap is full what gives????
<Rik Riel> stop running 91589 copies of XMMS 8)
<Linus> shut up riel god i hate you
** Riel is banned from linux-kernel
<Andrea> YO CHECK OUT THE NEW VM SYSTEM I WROTE THIS
MORNING^H^H^H^H^H^H^HWEEK!! ITLL FIX YOUR PROBLEMS!!!!
<Linus> k i know 2.4 is supposed to be a "stable" kernel but god i hate
that riel dude!! :| welp.. out with the old, in with the new!!!!!
** Linus integrates new VM
<Andrea> THANKS D00D
<Linus> no probs m8
..then yes, having UML as a sandbox can help.
The UML guys see it differently though. According to them: "It doesn't
need to be good for anything. It's fun!" Maybe Ski can embrace this
spirit also. ;)
> The reason I continue to use Ski is because it's one of the very few
> simulators out there that are (a) architecturally extremely accurate,
> (b) fast, and (c) very easy to setup & use. Ski is an asset for ia64
> linux, not a weakness.
>
> (And no, just because we have Ski doesn't mean we don't use real
> hardware. Nothing could be further from the truth.)
That's right - _you_ use real hardware because you actually have it.
Everyone else (figuratively speaking, though it's not far off the mark)
has no choice _but_ to use Ski. That sucks, regardless of whether or not
Ski is accurate, fast, or easy to use.
Anyway, I don't think there's much more that can be said. As Matt
indicated, we must pray for Deerfield, so I will continue to align my
holy carpet of hope to Fort Collins/Portland/Carly's hotel bedroom and
pray for reasonably priced IA64 hardware.
Duraid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-11 7:51 [Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software David Kågedal
2003-04-11 20:49 ` Duraid Madina
2003-04-11 22:08 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-11 22:54 ` Duraid Madina [this message]
2003-04-11 23:05 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-12 15:50 ` David Kågedal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705484@msgid-missing \
--to=duraid@octopus.com.au \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox