Re: time interpolation for sn2

Re: time interpolation for sn2

[Jesse Barnes]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:54:45AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> I applied your patches.  Speaking of SN2: could someone please give a
> thorough testing for the time-interpolator code on the SN2?  I asked
> in the past whether the current code is working properly and never got
> an answer.

Yeah, sorry, I've been busy trying to get 2.5 to work at all!  We have a
version of the code in a 2.4 based tree that works ok though, if that
helps.  Maybe Jes knows more since I think he was the last one to work
with that code in our tree...

If not, I'll let you know when I have 2.5 fully booting.

Thanks,
Jesse

Re: time interpolation for sn2

[Jes Sorensen]

Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:54:45AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> 
>>I applied your patches.  Speaking of SN2: could someone please give a
>>thorough testing for the time-interpolator code on the SN2?  I asked
>>in the past whether the current code is working properly and never got
>>an answer.
> 
> 
> Yeah, sorry, I've been busy trying to get 2.5 to work at all!  We have a
> version of the code in a 2.4 based tree that works ok though, if that
> helps.  Maybe Jes knows more since I think he was the last one to work
> with that code in our tree...
> 
> If not, I'll let you know when I have 2.5 fully booting.

Hi,

Sorry I never got around to subscribing to the new list, so I didn't
see this. Have you decided if the list move is going to be permanent?

I have 2.4 version of my old patch, but I was planning to backport
your 2.5 version to 2.4 shortly.

Cheers,
Jes

Re: time interpolation for sn2

[David Mosberger]

>>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:07:22 -0400, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com> said:

  Jes> Sorry I never got around to subscribing to the new list, so I didn't
  Jes> see this. Have you decided if the list move is going to be permanent?

I haven't seen any discussion of this yet.  I'm in favor of making it
permanent, though.

	--david