* Re: Early printk is Gone....???
2003-07-02 1:43 Early printk is Gone....??? Peter Chubb
@ 2003-07-02 12:22 ` Martin Hicks
2003-07-03 23:01 ` Peter Chubb
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Hicks @ 2003-07-02 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 475 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:43:33AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
>
> If I clone David's 2.5 tree (or use Linus's tree, same difference)
> CONFIG_IA64_EARLY_PRINTK is inoperative -- the code to do the work
> just isn't in the tree.
I just looked at the latest linux-ia64-2.5 bitkeeper tree and it appears
to be there. Note that you cannot use EARLY_PRINTK with a Generic
kernel anymore.
mh
--
Wild Open Source Inc. mort@wildopensource.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Early printk is Gone....???
2003-07-02 1:43 Early printk is Gone....??? Peter Chubb
2003-07-02 12:22 ` Martin Hicks
@ 2003-07-03 23:01 ` Peter Chubb
2003-07-04 2:51 ` Martin Hicks
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Chubb @ 2003-07-03 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> "Martin" = Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com> writes:
Martin> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:43:33AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> If I clone David's 2.5 tree (or use Linus's tree, same difference)
>> CONFIG_IA64_EARLY_PRINTK is inoperative -- the code to do the work
>> just isn't in the tree.
Martin> I just looked at the latest linux-ia64-2.5 bitkeeper tree and
Martin> it appears to be there. Note that you cannot use EARLY_PRINTK
Martin> with a Generic kernel anymore.
You're right, it is in David's tree, just not in the to-linus tree or
Linus's tree. My bad. Sorry...
Peter C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Early printk is Gone....???
2003-07-02 1:43 Early printk is Gone....??? Peter Chubb
2003-07-02 12:22 ` Martin Hicks
2003-07-03 23:01 ` Peter Chubb
@ 2003-07-04 2:51 ` Martin Hicks
2003-07-04 3:52 ` Peter Chubb
2003-07-07 20:11 ` David Mosberger
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Hicks @ 2003-07-04 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:01:45AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" = Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com> writes:
>
> Martin> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:43:33AM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
> >> If I clone David's 2.5 tree (or use Linus's tree, same difference)
> >> CONFIG_IA64_EARLY_PRINTK is inoperative -- the code to do the work
> >> just isn't in the tree.
>
> Martin> I just looked at the latest linux-ia64-2.5 bitkeeper tree and
> Martin> it appears to be there. Note that you cannot use EARLY_PRINTK
> Martin> with a Generic kernel anymore.
>
> You're right, it is in David's tree, just not in the to-linus tree or
> Linus's tree. My bad. Sorry...
EARLY_PRINTK is really only for bringup. It really don't expect that it
will ever be pushed to Linus. The to-linus tree is really only for
David to stick changesets in for Linus to pull into the mainline kernel.
It does not compile, and doesn't have to.
mh
--
Wild Open Source Inc. mort@wildopensource.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Early printk is Gone....???
2003-07-02 1:43 Early printk is Gone....??? Peter Chubb
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-04 2:51 ` Martin Hicks
@ 2003-07-04 3:52 ` Peter Chubb
2003-07-07 20:11 ` David Mosberger
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Chubb @ 2003-07-04 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> "Martin" = Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com> writes:
Martin> EARLY_PRINTK is really only for bringup. It really don't
Martin> expect that it will ever be pushed to Linus. The to-linus
Martin> tree is really only for David to stick changesets in for Linus
Martin> to pull into the mainline kernel. It does not compile, and
Martin> doesn't have to.
I understand that; the issue I have is that CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK is
defined in Kconfig, but does nothing, because the code is not there.
Peter c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Early printk is Gone....???
2003-07-02 1:43 Early printk is Gone....??? Peter Chubb
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2003-07-04 3:52 ` Peter Chubb
@ 2003-07-07 20:11 ` David Mosberger
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-07-07 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:52:48 +1000, Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au> said:
>>>>> "Martin" = Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com> writes:
Martin> EARLY_PRINTK is really only for bringup. It really don't
Martin> expect that it will ever be pushed to Linus. The to-linus
Martin> tree is really only for David to stick changesets in for Linus
Martin> to pull into the mainline kernel. It does not compile, and
Martin> doesn't have to.
Peter> I understand that; the issue I have is that CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK is
Peter> defined in Kconfig, but does nothing, because the code is not there.
That's a reasonable objection. I'll try to remember to move the
EARLY_PRINTK config option into the linux-ia64-2.5 tree as well.
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread