From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPUSET Proposal
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:59:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106447332309231@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106444308519469@msgid-missing>
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> It's meant to flatten the hierarchy ...
>> ...
>> The hierarchy is meant to be there, just ...
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:51:20PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> _What_ is meant to flatten the hierarchy ?? To what does "It" refer ??
> So is the hierarchy of CKRM there or not -- you've confused me.
> And in any case, are we in agreement that any such CKRM hierarchy
> is not isomorphic to the cpuset hierarchy?
The numerical share assignments.
I don't have the intestinal fortitude to pore over the pronouns used
in the last message.
The hierarchy used in CKRM is there.
I don't know if the CKRM hierarchy is different from yours or not.
It's a subgraph of the process inheritance hierarchy.
At any rate, I'll hope my little request to have similar mechanisms
consolidated is heeded somehow and bow out at this point.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 22:26 [Lse-tech] Re: CPUSET Proposal Hanna Linder
2003-09-25 5:39 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 5:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-25 6:09 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 6:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-25 6:38 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 6:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-25 6:51 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 6:59 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-09-25 7:11 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 13:11 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-25 13:19 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-25 13:21 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-25 13:26 ` Simon Derr
2003-09-25 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2003-09-25 18:49 ` Luck, Tony
2003-09-25 20:28 ` Yu, Fenghua
2003-09-26 7:17 ` Sylvain Jeaugey
2003-09-26 7:47 ` Sylvain Jeaugey
2003-09-26 12:57 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-26 13:29 ` Hubertus Franke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106447332309231@msgid-missing \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox