* make X server on zx2000 (and probably others) work again
@ 2003-10-22 0:59 David Mosberger
2003-10-22 22:47 ` H. J. Lu
2003-10-22 23:53 ` David Mosberger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-10-22 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
In recent 2.5/6 kernels, the X server on my zx2000/Radeon workstation
would cause a crash. Turns out this is due to a long-standing bug in
efi.c: the range checking in efi_mem_type() and efi_mem_attributes()
could cause an underflow if the size of a memory descriptor is zero
(as happens sometimes due to memory trimming). In my case, granule
zero had a zero size and that in turn caused all /dev/mem mappings to
occur with WRITE-BACK mapping, which doesn't make the X server happy
(instant MCA on a zx2000, for example).
Note that this bug existed for a long time, so it's possible that
there may have been other subtle memory-attribute related problems in
the past. This bug just became more noticable recently, since the
/dev/mem driver now completely ignores the O_SYNC flag and relies
totally on the value returned by efi_mem_attributes().
--david
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.1354 -> 1.1355
# arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c 1.25 -> 1.26
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/10/21 davidm@tiger.hpl.hp.com 1.1355
# ia64: Fix efi_mem_type() and efi_mem_attributes() to avoid potential
# underflows. In my case, the underflows occurred with the
# first memory descriptor which got trimmed down to a size of 0.
# Due to the underflow, this descriptor ended up covering the entire
# address-range which in turn caused Bad Things to happen with the
# X server.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c Tue Oct 21 17:53:28 2003
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c Tue Oct 21 17:53:28 2003
@@ -685,8 +685,7 @@
for (p = efi_map_start; p < efi_map_end; p += efi_desc_size) {
md = p;
- if ((md->phys_addr <= phys_addr) && (phys_addr <- (md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1)))
+ if (phys_addr - md->phys_addr < (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT))
return md->type;
}
return 0;
@@ -706,8 +705,7 @@
for (p = efi_map_start; p < efi_map_end; p += efi_desc_size) {
md = p;
- if ((md->phys_addr <= phys_addr) && (phys_addr <- (md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1)))
+ if (phys_addr - md->phys_addr < (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT))
return md->attribute;
}
return 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: make X server on zx2000 (and probably others) work again
2003-10-22 0:59 make X server on zx2000 (and probably others) work again David Mosberger
@ 2003-10-22 22:47 ` H. J. Lu
2003-10-22 23:53 ` David Mosberger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-10-22 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:59:58PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> In recent 2.5/6 kernels, the X server on my zx2000/Radeon workstation
> would cause a crash. Turns out this is due to a long-standing bug in
> efi.c: the range checking in efi_mem_type() and efi_mem_attributes()
> could cause an underflow if the size of a memory descriptor is zero
> (as happens sometimes due to memory trimming). In my case, granule
> zero had a zero size and that in turn caused all /dev/mem mappings to
> occur with WRITE-BACK mapping, which doesn't make the X server happy
> (instant MCA on a zx2000, for example).
>
> Note that this bug existed for a long time, so it's possible that
> there may have been other subtle memory-attribute related problems in
> the past. This bug just became more noticable recently, since the
> /dev/mem driver now completely ignores the O_SYNC flag and relies
> totally on the value returned by efi_mem_attributes().
>
I have a very strange problem with my bigsur. Whenever I put a new
kernel on it, it would crash at random without any warnings during boot
after a warm reboot. I had to power cycle it to get it to boot. After
applying this patch to 2.4.21, I have rebooted it twice without
powering it down first.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: make X server on zx2000 (and probably others) work again
2003-10-22 0:59 make X server on zx2000 (and probably others) work again David Mosberger
2003-10-22 22:47 ` H. J. Lu
@ 2003-10-22 23:53 ` David Mosberger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-10-22 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:47:13 -0700, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said:
HJ> I have a very strange problem with my bigsur. Whenever I put a
HJ> new kernel on it, it would crash at random without any warnings
HJ> during boot after a warm reboot. I had to power cycle it to get
HJ> it to boot. After applying this patch to 2.4.21, I have rebooted
HJ> it twice without powering it down first.
Interesting. Let's hope it has fixed this issue for good!
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-22 23:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-22 0:59 make X server on zx2000 (and probably others) work again David Mosberger
2003-10-22 22:47 ` H. J. Lu
2003-10-22 23:53 ` David Mosberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox