Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.33? 1/1] ata: call flush_dcache_page() around PIO data transfers in libata-aff.c
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:18:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265192325.1970.28.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265153568.2800.815.camel@mulgrave.site>

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 23:32 +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:21 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
> > Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:14:40 -0500
> >
> > > The patch in question only affects PIO transfers, not DMA.  Data is
> > > transferred from a kernel buffer to hardware via out[bwl] via
> > >
> > >     page data -> CPU register -> out[bwl]
> > >
> > > or, data is transferred from hardware to a kernel buffer via
> > >
> > >     in[bwl] -> CPU register -> page data
> > >
> > > So what are the flushing rules given those conditions?
> >
> > Any time you touch a page cache page with the cpu, you have
> > to get it purged from aliasing caches before it gets mapped
> > into userspace or similar.
> >
> > That's the problem on these machines.
> >
> > Actually, sparc64 is probably susceptible to the same problem.
> >
> > And it's not an issue in the IDE layer, know why? :-)
> >
> > In the IDE layer we have arch specific ide_*() interfaces which is
> > where all of this PIO dma flushing stuff deserves to live.
> >
> > ATA should do something similar instead of randomly scattering
> > flush_dcache_page() calls all over the place.
> 
> Agree with this, except it shouldn't be ide specific ... any driver that
> does PIO (we have some examples in SCSI) is vulnerable to this issue and
> should have the same fix.
> 
> The ide interfaces are very low level .. they're the ide_in/out[sw] APIs
> which aren't necessarily the most useful (some of the SCSI "PIO" stuff
> actually gets fed in via memory transfers to registers rather than port
> in/out). 
> 
> What it looks like we need is kmap_for_pio() and kunmap_for_pio() which
> take flags (or API extensions) indicating whether we're transferring to
> or from the device, which return the correct kernel address to the page
> (mapping it if it's in highmem) and perform the correct
> flushes/invalidates.

In a similar patch for dealing with a PIO USB HCD driver (ISP1760) I
suggested something like pio_map_single/pio_unmap_single similar to the
dma_* API. The problem with the HCD drivers is that the page information
is lost when they are called. They only have access to a
urb->transfer_buffer pointer and you can never know whether it is a
highmem one or not. Hence I think an API that deals directly with
pointers rather than page structures would be better.

If you are OK with the idea, I'm happy to propose a patch on linux-arch.

Thanks for the feedback so far.

-- 
Catalin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-03 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-02 22:11 [patch for 2.6.33? 1/1] ata: call flush_dcache_page() around PIO data transfers in libata-aff.c akpm
2010-02-02 22:58 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-02 23:05   ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-02 23:14     ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-02 23:21       ` James Bottomley
2010-02-02 23:21       ` David Miller
2010-02-02 23:30         ` Alan Cox
2010-02-02 23:32         ` James Bottomley
2010-02-02 23:39           ` David Miller
2010-02-03 10:18           ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2010-02-03 16:40             ` James Bottomley
2010-02-03 17:00               ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:06                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 17:15                   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:20                     ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 17:29                       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:39                         ` James Bottomley
2010-02-04 14:33                           ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-04 15:01                             ` James Bottomley
2010-02-04 15:39                               ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-04 21:36                                 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-03 17:40                     ` Alan Cox
2010-02-03 17:46                     ` Alan Cox
2010-02-03 17:52                       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 18:00                         ` Alan Cox
2010-02-03 18:12                           ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:49                     ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-03 17:54                       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:09               ` David Miller
2010-02-02 23:14     ` James Bottomley
2010-02-03 10:07   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1265192325.1970.28.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox