From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.33? 1/1] ata: call flush_dcache_page() around PIO data transfers in libata-aff.c
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:54:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B69B858.3070907@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265219390.1970.84.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
On 02/03/2010 12:49 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> No, it doesn't. If the page isn't a highmem one, the kunmap doesn't do
> anything to the caches (and I also have highmem disabled). My logic was
> based on a statement in cachetlb.txt that flush_dcache_page() should be
> called if the kernel writes to a page cache page, hence the patch (as it
> was pointed out, the first call to flush_dcache_page() isn't needed).
Well, if those are the API rules, libata certainly must follow them...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-03 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-02 22:11 [patch for 2.6.33? 1/1] ata: call flush_dcache_page() around PIO data transfers in libata-aff.c akpm
2010-02-02 22:58 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-02 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-02 23:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-02 23:21 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-02 23:21 ` David Miller
2010-02-02 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-02 23:32 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-02 23:39 ` David Miller
2010-02-03 10:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-03 16:40 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-03 17:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:06 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 17:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:39 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-04 14:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-04 15:01 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-04 15:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-04 21:36 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-03 17:40 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-03 17:46 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-03 17:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 18:00 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-03 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-03 17:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-03 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2010-02-03 17:09 ` David Miller
2010-02-02 23:14 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-03 10:07 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B69B858.3070907@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox